Intellectual Property Law
New Matter Spring 2015, Volume 40, Number 1
Content
- 2015 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- Case Comments
- Contents
- Copyright Interest Group
- Del Monte International v. Del Monte Corporation: the Battle for the .Delmonte Top-Level Domain
- Entertainment and Sports Law Interest Group
- Federal Circuit Review
- Intellectual Property Section Executive Committee 2014-2015
- Intellectual Property Section Interest Group Representatives 2014-2015
- International Interest Group
- International Ip Developments
- Legislation Update
- Letter from the Chair
- Letter from the Editor-in-Chief
- Licensing Interest Group
- Litigation Interest Group
- MCLE Self-Study Article
- Ninth Circuit Report
- Patent Interest Group
- Sins of Omission: Panduit's Overreach in Patent Model Jury instructions
- Supreme Court Considers Two Trademark Cases That May Alter How Holders Register, Protect, and Use Their Marks
- Technology, Internet, and Privacy Interest Group
- The State Bar of California Intellectual Property Alumni
- Trade Secrets Interest Group
- Trademark Interest Group
- The Licensing Corner
The Licensing Corner
JAMES C. ROBERTS III Global Capital Law Group PC
BEING (UN)REASONABLE WITH AGREEMENT TERMS
Introduction
Drafting lawyers use "standard" legalese all the time, often without thinking through the implications. A recent article got me thinking about several such instances.1 I’ve chosen two oft-used terms: "Best efforts/commercially reasonable efforts" and "unreasonably withholding consent."