Intellectual Property Law
New Matter Spring 2015, Volume 40, Number 1
Content
- Licensing Interest Group
- Contents
- Technology, Internet, and Privacy Interest Group
- Trade Secrets Interest Group
- Letter from the Editor-in-Chief
- Sins of Omission: Panduit's Overreach in Patent Model Jury instructions
- The State Bar of California Intellectual Property Alumni
- International Interest Group
- Copyright Interest Group
- MCLE Self-Study Article
- International Ip Developments
- Supreme Court Considers Two Trademark Cases That May Alter How Holders Register, Protect, and Use Their Marks
- Case Comments
- Intellectual Property Section Executive Committee 2014-2015
- Trademark Interest Group
- Litigation Interest Group
- Intellectual Property Section Interest Group Representatives 2014-2015
- Letter from the Chair
- Patent Interest Group
- Legislation Update
- Del Monte International v. Del Monte Corporation: the Battle for the .Delmonte Top-Level Domain
- Ninth Circuit Report
- Entertainment and Sports Law Interest Group
- 2015 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- The Licensing Corner
- Federal Circuit Review
The Licensing Corner
JAMES C. ROBERTS III Global Capital Law Group PC
BEING (UN)REASONABLE WITH AGREEMENT TERMS
Introduction
Drafting lawyers use "standard" legalese all the time, often without thinking through the implications. A recent article got me thinking about several such instances.1 I’ve chosen two oft-used terms: "Best efforts/commercially reasonable efforts" and "unreasonably withholding consent."