Intellectual Property Law
New Matter Spring 2015, Volume 40, Number 1
Content
- 2015 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- Contents
- Copyright Interest Group
- Del Monte International v. Del Monte Corporation: the Battle for the .Delmonte Top-Level Domain
- Entertainment and Sports Law Interest Group
- Federal Circuit Review
- Intellectual Property Section Executive Committee 2014-2015
- Intellectual Property Section Interest Group Representatives 2014-2015
- International Interest Group
- International Ip Developments
- Legislation Update
- Letter from the Chair
- Letter from the Editor-in-Chief
- Licensing Interest Group
- Litigation Interest Group
- MCLE Self-Study Article
- Ninth Circuit Report
- Patent Interest Group
- Sins of Omission: Panduit's Overreach in Patent Model Jury instructions
- Supreme Court Considers Two Trademark Cases That May Alter How Holders Register, Protect, and Use Their Marks
- Technology, Internet, and Privacy Interest Group
- The Licensing Corner
- The State Bar of California Intellectual Property Alumni
- Trade Secrets Interest Group
- Trademark Interest Group
- Case Comments
Case Comments
LOWELL ANDERSON Stetina Brunda Garred & Brucker
ADVERTISING
A New Jersey law banned an attorney advertising guideline that required any advertising that included a laudatory quotation from a reported judicial decision to have the entire judicial opinion appear in full. The guideline unduly restricted the First Amendment right of free speech. Dwyer v. Cappell, 762 F.3d 275, 112 U.S.P.Q.2d 1140 (3rd Cir. 2014).