Intellectual Property Law
New Matter Spring 2015, Volume 40, Number 1
Content
- Licensing Interest Group
- Contents
- Technology, Internet, and Privacy Interest Group
- Trade Secrets Interest Group
- Letter from the Editor-in-Chief
- Sins of Omission: Panduit's Overreach in Patent Model Jury instructions
- The State Bar of California Intellectual Property Alumni
- International Interest Group
- Copyright Interest Group
- MCLE Self-Study Article
- International Ip Developments
- Supreme Court Considers Two Trademark Cases That May Alter How Holders Register, Protect, and Use Their Marks
- Case Comments
- Intellectual Property Section Executive Committee 2014-2015
- Trademark Interest Group
- Litigation Interest Group
- Intellectual Property Section Interest Group Representatives 2014-2015
- Letter from the Chair
- Patent Interest Group
- Legislation Update
- Del Monte International v. Del Monte Corporation: the Battle for the .Delmonte Top-Level Domain
- Ninth Circuit Report
- Entertainment and Sports Law Interest Group
- 2015 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- The Licensing Corner
- Federal Circuit Review
Case Comments
LOWELL ANDERSON Stetina Brunda Garred & Brucker
ADVERTISING
A New Jersey law banned an attorney advertising guideline that required any advertising that included a laudatory quotation from a reported judicial decision to have the entire judicial opinion appear in full. The guideline unduly restricted the First Amendment right of free speech. Dwyer v. Cappell, 762 F.3d 275, 112 U.S.P.Q.2d 1140 (3rd Cir. 2014).