Intellectual Property Law
New Matter Spring 2015, Volume 40, Number 1
Content
- 2015 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- Case Comments
- Contents
- Copyright Interest Group
- Del Monte International v. Del Monte Corporation: the Battle for the .Delmonte Top-Level Domain
- Entertainment and Sports Law Interest Group
- Federal Circuit Review
- Intellectual Property Section Executive Committee 2014-2015
- Intellectual Property Section Interest Group Representatives 2014-2015
- International Interest Group
- International Ip Developments
- Legislation Update
- Letter from the Editor-in-Chief
- Licensing Interest Group
- Litigation Interest Group
- MCLE Self-Study Article
- Ninth Circuit Report
- Patent Interest Group
- Sins of Omission: Panduit's Overreach in Patent Model Jury instructions
- Supreme Court Considers Two Trademark Cases That May Alter How Holders Register, Protect, and Use Their Marks
- Technology, Internet, and Privacy Interest Group
- The Licensing Corner
- The State Bar of California Intellectual Property Alumni
- Trade Secrets Interest Group
- Trademark Interest Group
- Letter from the Chair
Letter from the Chair
SOPHIE COHEN Cobalt LLP
Dear fellow Section members,
It’s going to be another exciting year in IP! 2015 started off with a bang, with the U.S. Supreme Court having already issued two significant intellectual property rulings in January. In Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., the Court changed the standard of appellate review for patent claim construction, holding that the appellate court must apply a "clear error" (not de novo) standard of review and give deference to the trial judge’s factual findings, which is discussed in more detail in Glenn Von Tersch’s column on the Federal Circuit in this issue. In Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank, the Court ruled that the "trademark tacking" issue (the question of whether a prior version of a trademark may be "tacked" on to a later version of the mark for purposes of determining priority) is a factual question for a jury to decide, which is discussed in more detail in Douglas Masters’ article on page 5 and Anne-Marie Dao’s column on the Ninth Circuit in this issue. On the policy Iront, we expect the 114th Congress will continue to consider copyright reform, Copyright Office modernization, patent litigation reform, and trade secret legislation.
Our Section keeps up with these developments and works hard to provide you with practical, advanced, and innovative educational offerings. Our Interest Groups and program chairs like to think outside the box. A perfect example is the brand new Adults Only IP conference, which was held in Los Angeles at the end of February. This unique event covered topics not usually (or ever!) addressed in a professional CLE setting, including IP law for cannabis businesses, strategies for protecting adult entertainment content, IP and the First Amendment, challenges posed by scandalous marks, and the ethical considerations of representing controversial clients.