For over 30 years, the Taxation Section has sent an annual delegation of tax attorneys to Washington, D.C., to present papers on issues of concern to California tax practitioners. The ideas for these tax law improvements come from work with clients (including pro bono ones), research and teaching. Generally, the proposals aim to simplify the law, make it more equitable, modernize it, and/or improve enforcement. The proposals represent the views of the authors and are not the official views of the California Lawyers Association or its Taxation Section.
REQUIREMENTS FOR TOPIC SUBMISSIONS
Anyone wishing to be considered for participation in the 2024 Sacramento Delegation will be required to submit a written (topic) proposal, approximately 2-3 pages in length. The Taxation Section does not cover any participant’s expenses.
Each proposal must include the following:
- An outline of the substance of the proposed topic with appropriate detail of the subject matter to be covered.
- A discussion of the current law, and the reason for the proposed change, together with an explanation of the proposed change in sufficient detail to permit technical evaluation.
- A “Problems Addressed” section identifying the problems addressed by the proposal; indicating why the problem is sufficiently important and widespread to merit attention; and stating whether other proposals have been advanced to address the same problem.
- A “Merits of the Proposal” section, noting the proposal’s advantages and disadvantages for various categories of taxpayers or transactions, both as compared to current law and as compared to other proposals for changing the law.
- A discussion of any important collateral consequences the proposal may have with respect to other tax laws.
- An explanation of why the proposal is feasible – politically and economically. In this regard, authors should be cognizant of the restrictions placed on possible tax legislation by Propositions 13 and 26.
- A statement as to with whom the author has discussed the topic in government, whether it be an individual legislator, a legislative committee staff member, or any California tax agency or legislative committee. If no such contact has been made, also note that.
- A statement as to whether the author presently or previously has had a matter involving the issue pending before any state or local tax authority (e.g., FTB, EDD, CDTFA, BOE, County Board of Supervisors, Assessor), administrative tribunal or court.
- A statement as to whether the author has or has had a direct personal or financial interest in the issue addressed in the paper. If yes, include an explanation.
- The names of two suggested reviewers (neither reviewer can be a member of, employed by, or otherwise associated with the author’s company or firm). Be sure these reviewers are able to meet the quick turnaround time in August (schedule is forthcoming).
QUESTIONS AND ISSUES TO CONSIDER WHEN PROPOSING, DRAFTING AND REVIEWING TOPICS, PROPOSALS AND PAPERS
The following questions should help you formulate proposals, draft or review papers, and anticipate questions from officials in Sacramento.
1. Why should the government take any action on this issue?
- What makes it important enough to incur the costs of changing the current rules?
- Why should action be taken now? Have there been any new developments, such as a new case, a new position by a California tax agency, or economic changes?
2. What are the problems with the current law?
- How widespread are the problems? On a macro level, possible problems include cost, complexity, administrability and horizontal inequity.
- On a micro level, for whom or what is the current regime a problem?
- Consider both categories of transactions and categories of taxpayers. Be as particular as possible in identifying the problems and reasons for change.
3. What are the advantages of your proposal?
- Whom would it help and how?
- If you are carving out a category for special treatment when there are others arguably similarly situated, what justifies the special treatment?
4. What are the disadvantages of your solution? (Ask yourself the questions a government official would ask.)
- Who would it hurt? Consider groups other than your own clients; small business vs. large; in-state taxpayers vs. multistate taxpayers; individual taxpayers; fiscal year taxpayers; taxpayers subject to AMT; particular industries; particular transactions. Don’t forget the government’s interest.
- Would your proposal open loopholes? How can you guard against abuse and avoid complicating the proposal?
5. What analogies to your proposal exist in the current law?
- Do they argue in favor of or against your solution?
- Have they been developed for situations and problems that are similar to or different from your problem?
6. Why should action be taken at the level you propose (legislation vs. regulation vs. ruling)?
7. If you are proposing administrative action, does the FTB, BOE, CDTFA or EDD have the authority?
8. Are there or have there been other proposals to address the issue already on the table (possibly from other bar groups, the ALI or AICPA, trade associations, academia, or state or federal legislation)?
- How do they compare to your proposal?
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of each of those alternatives?
- If your first choice were to be rejected, do you have an alternative proposal?
9. Have you discussed the relevant legislative or administrative history?
- What was the stated purpose for adopting the current rule?
- Have you thoroughly addressed those concerns?
- Might there be other, unexpressed (for example, political) reasons for the current law? Does your proposal address these concerns?
10. What are the collateral consequences of your proposal for other tax laws?
11. Might your proposal affect laws and rules outside of tax? Why should the problem be addressed through the tax laws?
12. Is your paper as short as possible? Your paper should be thoughtful and thorough, but to the point.
13. Do you have an accurate, brief and inviting title for the paper?
2025 Washington, D.C. Delegation, May 5 – May 7, 2025
- Delegation Chair: Natascha Fastabend
- Delegation Vice Chair: Raul Villarreal-Garza
- Delegation Team Members: Myriam Bouaziz, Jackie Zumaeta, Cindy Ho, Jonathan Kalinski
2024 Washington, D.C. Delegation, April 30 – May 1, 2024
- Delegation Chair: Natascha Fastabend
- Delegation Vice Chair: Mike Shaikh
- Delegation Team Members: Thomas Giordano and Raul Villarreal Garza
1. PROPOSED CHANGES TO IRS INDIVIDUAL ESTIMATED TAX PAYMENTS UNDER IRC §6654
- Adam Brewer
- Annette Nellen
- Jin Soo Lee and Rami Khoury
- Jonathan T. Amitrano and Phillip J. Colasanto
- James Creech. Travis Thompson & Derek Reuter
- Michelle B. Graham, Esq.
- Patrick W. Martin and Luz E. Villegas
- Jonathan Kalinski, Esq. and Philipp Behrendt, LL.M., Esq.
10. Proposed Revisions to the 2053 Proposed Regulations
- Robin Klomparens
Past Delegations
2023 Washington, D.C. Delegation, May 16-17, 2023
The 2023 DC Delegation was led by Annette Nellen.
The Delegation serves a variety of functions. The most important is to make a substantive contribution to the federal tax laws. The Delegation also familiarizes government officials with the experience and concerns of California tax lawyers. Past Delegations have raised the awareness of government tax officials of the California bar and have enhanced our ability to play a significant role in federal tax policy. Read More
2023 Table of Contents | May 16-17, 2023
- EXPAND THE DEPENDENT CARE CREDIT BY REMOVING THE “SAME PRINCIPAL PLACE OF ABODE” REQUIREMENT OF IRC §21
[paper not yet available; see executive summary included in item #20 below]
- Saba Shatara and Campbell McLaren
- Andrew Gradman
- Charles J. Taylor
- Daniel W. Soto and Michael E. Romero
- John C. Miles
- Andrew D. Allen, Nicola Liu, Kendall Keshtkar, and Anthony Cipriano
- Gregory Zbylut
- Avram Salkin, Robert S. Horwitz and Gary Markarian
- PROPOSED CHANGES TO JUDICIAL JURISDICTION FOR ASSESSABLE PENALTIES AND FOREIGN INFORMATION PENALTIES
- Edward M. Robbins, Jr. and Michael Greenwade
- Sandra R. Brown-Bodner, Michel Stein, and Philipp Behrendt
- Kevan P. McLaughlin
- Elizabeth Glasgow and Brian Tsu
- Annette Nellen
- Marsha Dungog and Jennifer Silvius
- Robin Klomparens
- Raúl Villareal Garza and Pedro E. Corona
- “Dennis” Nguyen
- Kristin N. Capritto and Wayne R. Johnson
- THE NEED FOR CROSS-AGENCY ENFORCEMENT OF FATCA TAX FRAUD—WITH NEW TOOLS PROVIDED BY ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ACT OF 2020: FRAUD THAT UTILIZES THE U.S. FINANCIAL SYSTEM VIA PROFESSIONAL ENABLERS
For a summary of this paper, please see the executive summary below at #20. The author can be reached by contacting the section at Taxation@calawyers.org.
- Patrick Martin and Daniel C. Silva
These ideas for these papers were generated by the work the authors do for clients including pro bono ones, and from teaching and research activities. Generally, these recommendations would simplify the tax law, make it more equitable, update certain tax laws, and/or improve compliance and enforcement.
The views expressed in each paper are those of the particular author(s) and not necessarily those of the California Lawyers Association or its Taxation Section. Although the authors or reviewers of any paper might have clients or employers affected by the rules addressed in that paper, no such person was specifically engaged by a client or employer to participate in that proposal.
2022 WASHINGTON, D.C. DELEGATION
This delegation was led by Kevan P. McLaughlin:
- Marsha-laine Dungog, Jennifer S. Silvius, and Jonathan Garbutt, Advocating for Administrative Guidance on the US Tax Treatment of Canadian Registered Plans (The Canadian Tax-Free Savings Account and Retirement Compensation Arrangement) as Foreign Trusts Subject to Annual Information Reporting Requirements (Forms 3520, 3520-A) (IRC §§ 6048, 6677)
- Annette Nellen, Proposal for a Tax Form for Ease and Transparency of Reconciling Information Reports on Form 1040
- Andrew Gradman, QOZ Planning When Penalties are a Certainty
- Jason Galek, Minna Yang, and Miranda Freeman, Proposed Changes to Treatment of Water Rights as Property Eligible for Charitable Deduction Under IRC § 170
- Patrick Martin and Anuar Estefan, The Need for Tax Residency Clarity for Those ‘Green Card Holder’s’ Who Have Lost Their Lawful Permanent Residency Status as a Matter of Law
- Robin Klomparens, Crummey is Crummey
- James Creech, Dennis Leonard, and Justin Miller, A Creative Critique of the Current Cryptic Rules for Taxing Crypto
2021 WASHINGTON, D.C. DELEGATION – MAY 10 – 11, 2021
This delegation was led by Kevan P. McLaughlin:
- US Composite Income Tax Reporting For Non-resident International Business Travelers
- Suggestions for Improving Tax Compliance Through Greater Tax System Transparency and Accountability
- Solidifying the Exclusion for Cancellation of Indebtedness Income Related to Home Loan Reductions
- Proposed Revision of the Income Tax “Grantor Trust Rules” and Corresponding Provisions of the Estate and Gift Tax Rules
- Making Z Connection: Changes the IRS Should Implement to Reach Generation
The Delegation serves a variety of functions. The most important is to make a substantive contribution to the federal tax laws. The Delegation also familiarizes government officials with the experience and concerns of California tax lawyers. Past Delegations have raised the awareness of government tax officials of the California bar and have enhanced our ability to play a significant role in federal tax policy.
2020 WASHINGTON, D.C. DELEGATION
This event was cancelled due to the COVID pandemic; papers in progress were moved to 2021.
2019 Washington, D.C. Delegation
The Delegation met with key government officials at IRS National Office, Treasury Department, Joint Committee on Taxation, House Ways and Means Committee, Senate Finance Committee, United States Tax Court and Department of Justice Tax Division.
The following tax practitioners presented the papers listed below:
- James Creech: Request for Additional Guidance Relating to Virtual Currency and Other Blockchain Based Rewards
- Marsha Laine Dungog and Liguo Cooper Xu: Advocating for the Canadian Registered Education Savings Plan and Registered Disability Savings Plan to be Exempt From Annual Foreign Trust Reporting Requirements
- Robert S. Horwitz and Jonathan Kalinski: Clarifying Provisions on the Assessment and Collection of Foreign Information Reporting Penalties
- Kurt K. Kawafuchi, Caroline D. Ciraolo, and Judy Y. Lee: The Need for Administrative and Statutory Relief for Executors and Fiduciaries Seeking to Resolve Exposure under the Federal Priority Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3713, Arising From Potential Tax Liabilities of Decedents and Incapacitated Taxpayers
- Robin L. Klomparens: When Will Modifications of a By-Pass Trust be Respected for Basis Step-up
- Patrick W. Martin: The Need to Close the “FATCA LOOPHOLE” to Preserve the Integrity of FATCA and U.S. Tax Enforcement Efforts
- John C. Miles and Eric D. Swenson: Request for Guidance Regarding Making Proper S Corporation Consents on Form 2553, Election by a Small Business Corporation
- Justin T. Miller and Martin Behn: Adverse Enough to be a Non-Grantor Trust
- Silvio Reggiardo III, Esq. and Kristin N. Capritto, Esq.: Creating Uniformity in Partial Interest Discounts with Safe Harbor Valuation Discount Tables
- Barbara Rhomberg: Technical Corrections and Additional Guidance Needed for New Charitable Deduction Substantiation Regulations Under §170
- Kaelyn J. Romey: Amending the U.S. Tax Court Subpoena Rules & Forms to Conform to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Streamlining Pretrial Discovery
- Raúl Villarreal Garza: Providing Relief to United States Persons that Inadvertently Became United States Shareholders of Controlled Foreign Corporations as a Result of Repealing IRC §958(b)(4)
- Steven L. Walker and Adria S. Price: Comments and Proposed Guidance on the IRS’ Revocation or Denial of Passport in Case of Certain Unpaid Taxes Under Internal Revenue Code Section 7345
- Gregory Zbylut: An Actor, a Producer and a Director Walk into a Bar…and They’re all the Same Person; How the Lack of Clear Definitions in Section 199A Creates Confusion
2018 WASHINGTON, D.C. DELEGATION
The 2018 D.C. Delegation was held May 7 – 8, 2018. Kurt Kawafuchi led the delegation.
- Andrew S. Atkin and William Choi, The IRS or The Treasury Department Should Issue Guidance Clarifying That Disqualified Persons Are Permitted to Guarantee Legal Obligations of a Private Foundation
- Shirley Chin and Wolfram Pohl, Clarifying That an Integral Analysis is Not REquired For Storage Devices to be a Part of Solar Energy Property under Regulation 1.48-9(d)(3), Through IRS Published Guidance
- James Creech, Amendment of IRC Section 152(e) In Order to Better Reflect Taxpayer Reality and Ensure Taxpayer Safety
- Marsha-laine Dungog and Roy Berg, Clarifying Subpart F and PFIC Income Inclusion Upon Renunciation of U.S. Citizenship
- Robin L. Klomparens and Kristin N. Capritto, An Uncertain Future: How the Potential Clawback Muddies the Estate and Gift Tax Waters
- Robert S. Horwitz and Carolyn M. Lee, Extending the Statute of Limitations for Claiming Innocent Spouse Relief (IRC §6015(b), (c))
- Dennis I. Leonard and Alison B. Arnold, Helpful Suggestions for Improving Compliance with Information Regarding Beneficiaries Acquiring Property From a Decedent (Form 8971) and the Associated Basis Consistency Requirements
- Kevan P. McLaughlin, Proposed Changes to IRS Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) (Or More Broadly Now, Refundable Tax Credits and Head of Household Filing Status) Due Diligence Standards Under IRC § 6695(g) (Treas. Reg. §§ 1.6695-2, 1.6695-2T)
- John Miles and Liliana Menzie, Request for Guidance Regarding The Relevance Requirement of The Check-The-Box Regulations
- William H. Quealy, Jr., Request for Procedures to Obtain Relief From the Timely Reporting Requirement of Section 1.482-1(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Regulations
2017 Washington, D.C. Delegation, April 30 – May 2, 2017
The 2017 D. C. Delegation was held April 30 – May 2. Rebecca O’Toole led the delegation.
- Noah Metz, Proposal To Allow Earned Income From The Prior Tax Year To Count As Earned Income For The Succeeding Tax Year For Purposes Of Computing The Earned Income Tax Credit.
- Jonathan Amitrano and Lisa Nelson, The Continuation Penalty Found in IRC Section 6038, 6038A, and 6038D Should Be Amended to Require Notice Be Sent to the Taxpayers Last Known Address
- Robin Klomparens, Proposal to Allow Permanent Relief for Late Portability Elections Under Certain Circumstances
- Helen Cheng and Dina Nam, Bridging the Gaps Between Expatriating Individuals, Immigration Officials, and the Department of Treasury (IRC 877A)
- Raul Villareal Garza and Patrick Martin, 8858 – Requiring notice without statutory authority
- Pedro E. Corona and Marsha Laine Dungog, Clarifying the United States Income Treatment of Mexican Retirement Funds (AFORES) Owned by US Persons
- Michelle B. Graham, Kelina Smith and Katie Swafford, Changing Reporting Requirements to Conform to Non-Securities-Based Crowdfunding
- Justin T. Miller, Have Your Cake and Eat It Too: Charitable Deductions for Charitable LLCs
- James Creech, Expanding the Fringe Benefits Allowed Under IRC Section 132 to Better Reflect Modern Means of Shared Transit
- Andrea Ross, Proposed Guidance Under Section 1014 Regarding the Basis of Grantor Trust Assets Following the Grantor’s Death
- Sherrie Boutwell and Evan Giller, Retirement Plans for Non-Profits- IRC 403(b), Revenue Procedure 2013-12 & Revenue Procedure 2016-51
2016 Washington, D.C. Delegation, May 1-3, 2016
The 2016 Delegation was held on May 1-3. Kaelyn Romey led the Delegation. The following tax practitioners presented the papers listed below:
- Kevan P. McLaughlin, Esq., and James C. Counts II, CPA, CTFA: Proposed Changes to the Certified Professional Employer Organization (“CPEO”) Program (IRC §§ 3511 and 7705)
- Veronica Long: Proposed Change to Allow Liability Netting for Partnerships Subject to Involuntary Conversion
- Kay Guinane and Cherie Evans: Gap between Tax and Sanctions Law: Blocking Lifesaving Aid from Vulnerable Populations
- Patrick W. Martin and Agustin Ceballos: Guidance Needed Regarding Federal Estate Taxation of Exchange Traded Funds Owned by Nonresident Aliens
- Roy A. Berg and Marsha-laine Dungog: The United States Income Tax Treatment of Australian Superannuation Funds Owned by U.S. Persons
- Robert Denham and Robin L. Klomparens: Proposal to Clarify Community Property Basis Adjustment Rules for Surviving Domestic Partners and Nonresident Spouses
- Mark C. Morris and Jared P. Werner: Proposed Guidance Under Internal Revenue Code § 1014(b)(1), (3)
- Julie Treppa: Improved Guidance for Non-Profit Organizations Utilizing New Markets Tax Credits to Better Serve Low-Income Communities
- Alexandra Eaker Pérez & Mark P. Laemmle: Federal Refundable Excise Tax Credits: A Justification for Exclusion from Gross Income
- Liliana Menzie and Steven L. Walker: Form W-9 or W-8BEN? The Proper Classification of a Dual Resident Taxpayer for Purposes of Documenting Status with a Foreign Financial Institution under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act
2015 Washington D.C. Delegation, May 3-5, 2015
The 2015 Delegation was held on May 3-5. Thomas Giordano-Lascari led the Delegation. The following tax practitioners presented the papers listed below:
- Aubrey Hone, Josh Maxwell and Alexis Binazir: Provin A Negative: What Is Reasonable Cause? U.S. Offshore Reporting Obligations and the Average International Taxpayer
- N. Aaron Johnson and Jenni Harmon: Clarifying Standards for Trade or Business Real Estate Under IRC Section 108(A)(1)(D)
- Bill Finestone, Chip Parks and Susan Leahy: Tired of Being Exhausted: Wait and See Approach to the Probability of Exhaustion Test for Charitable Remainder Annuity Trusts
- Robert Denham: Proposal to Clarify Portion Rules That Determine When a Power Holder Other Than the Grantor Is Treated as the Owner of Trust Income
- Robin Klomparens and Dick Kinyon: Wishlist for Changes in Portability
- Justin Miller: Section 682 Spousal Support Trusts: The Need to Define “Income”
- Michael Karlin and Liliana Menzie: Request for Guidance Regarding Dual Residents Under Treasury Regulations Section 301.7701(B)-7 Who Are
Treated as Nonresident Aliens of the United States - Paul McCullum: Bitcoin – Property or Currency
- Greg Zbylut: The Bankruptcy Trap – Fixing the 523(a) Problem
- Robert Horwitz and Jeremiah Coder: Ensuring Due Process in IRS Credit Offsets
- Patrick Martin: Reasons Why U.S. Citizens Abroad Need a TIN Other Than a SSN
2014 Washington, D.C., Delegation, May 4-6, 2014
The 2014 Delegation was held on May 4-6. Andrea Kushner Ross led the Delegation. Selected delegates met for the first time with officials from the Department of Justice Tax Division, including the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Tax Division. The following tax practitioners presented the papers listed below:
- Alexandra Eaker & Ashley Kerins: IRS Rank & Church Tax Inquiries: An Analysis Of Proposed Treasury Regulations Under § 7611
- Courtney Nash Gardner & Jorge Lopez: Proposed Guidance for Donor Advised Funds
- Douglas L. Youmans & N. Aaron Johnson: Information Letter Notice 2013-0036 And Why California’s Anti-Deficiency Statutes Convert Recourse Debt To Nonrecourse Debt
- Dennis Leonard & Jason Schingler: Using a “Formula” General Power of Appointment to Resolve Income Tax Basis “Step Up” Issues in The Age Of Portability and a Request for Clarification Regarding Rev. Proc. 2001-38
- Patrick Martin: Covered Gifts & Bequests: The Need For Guidance (5+ Years Out)
- John W. Prokey & Alison B. Merino: Portability, QTIP Elections, and the Effect On Fiduciaries
- David L. Rice & Lisa O. Nelson: Proposal to Expand the Scope and Definition for “Person” to Allow for Third Parties in Alter Ego and Nominee Cases/Investigations to Obtain Notice of Such Potential Alter Ego or Nominee Investigation Prior to Liens or Levys Being Filed and/or Notice Before Levy
- Robin Komoparens & Irnina Rospotnyuk: Achieving Simplicity: Extending the Annual GST Tax Exclusion to Direct Skips to Trusts and to Indirect Skips (IRC § 2642(c))
- Jeffrey A. Titus: The Effective Tax Administration Hardship Offer-in-Compromise: Improving the Standards of Review and Increasing the Acceptance Rates
- Robert S. Horwitz & Steven L. Walker: The Modification and Compromise of Restitution Orders in Criminal Tax Cases
- Gregory A. Zbylut: A Proposal for Modifying the 36-Month Rule Imposed by Treas. Reg. 1.6050P-1(b)(2)(ii)(H)
2013 Washington, D.C. Delegation, May 6-7, 2013
The 2013 Delegation was held on May 6-7. The following tax practitioners presented the papers listed below:
- Carolyn M. Lee , IRC Section 6015 Proposed Refinement to the Actual Knowledge Test
- Jordan A. Lui and Minna C. Yang, Proposed Guidance Under Internal Revenue Code Section 170(f)(8)
- Frederick Wooldridge and Shafagh Ghiassi, Proposed Framework for the U.S. Federal Income Taxation of Cloud Computing Transactions
- Kevan P. McLaughlin, Proposed Changes to the I.R.S. Whistleblower Program
- Christina K. Harper, The Tricky Business of Allocating Settlement Awards to Wage Income: A Proposed Safe Harbor and Guidance on Attorney Fee Awards
- Michael P. Burns, Proposed Guidance Under Internal Revenue Code Section 707 Relating to Disguised Sales of Property
- Gregory A. Zbylut, Streamlining the Late ‘S’ Election Process
- Rebecca O’ Toole and Joy Chang, Proposed Guidance Under Treasury Regulation § 1.170(A)-9(f)(7)(iii) – How Much is “Almost All?”: The Case for Keeping the “Math” in the Otherwise Mathematical Public Support Equation
- Jenna (Shih) Anderson and Po Han Chen, Proposed Guidance Internal Revenue Code §§ 901(a), 275(a)(4), and 905(c)
- Lavar Taylor and Grace Alcantara, Proposal to Amend Treasury Regulation §301.6303-1 to Conform to IRC §6303 and Relevant Court Decisions
- Professor Reuven Avi-Yonah and Patrick W. Martin, Tax Simplification: The Need for Consistent Tax Treatment of all Individuals (Citizens, Lawful Permanent Residents and Non-Citizens Regardless of Immigration Status) Residing Overseas, Including the Repeal of U.S. Citizenship Based Taxation
2010 Washington, D.C. Delegation, May 3-4, 2010
The 2010 Delegation was held on May 3-4. The delegation was led by Eric Swenson. The following tax practitioners presented the papers listed below:
- Michael R.E. Sanders, Comments and Information Provided by Practitioners for the U.S. Tax Court
- Woodford G. Rowland, Proposed Changes to Tax Court Rules Regarding Administrative Record I Collection Due Process Cases
- Stuart Simon, Proposed Amendment of IRC Section 6425 to Provide Owners of Pass-through Entities with Quick Refunds of Overpayment of Estimated Income Tax
- Steven L. Walker, The Application of Section 482 Transfer Pricing Principles to Financial Transactions, Including Guarantees and Credit Support Arrangements
- Geoffrey A. Weg and Thomas Giordano-Lascari, Proposed Guidance under Code Section 108(c)(3)
- Annette Nellen and Chad Jaben, Modernizing and Rationalizing Depreciation
- Steven Chiodini and Nancy E. McGlamery, Proposed Revisions to Treasury Regulation § 1.863-1(d)
- Tim Gustafson, The Modernization of P.L. 86-272: State Tax Nexus Fifty Years Later
- Robert Horwitz and Courtney Hopley, Temporary Regulations Under I.R.C. § 6501(e)(1)(A) and 6229(c)(2): Revisiting Omissions from Gross Income
- Robin L. Klomparens and Kelly Fernald Tiberini, Suggested Procedure for Filing and Perfecting Protective Claims Under Treasury Regulations § 20.2053-1
- Mark E. Powell and Andrea Kushner Ross, Proposed Guidance under Treasury Regulation Section 1.509(a)-4
- Dennis I. Leonard, Section 4941’s Self-Dealing Traps for Tenants-In-Common in Real Property: Easy Solutions to Complex Problems
- Ofer Lion, Treatment of the Discharge of Indebtedness Under the Unrelated Business Taxable Income Rules
- Patrick W. Martin, Proposed Guidance on FBARs & Foreign Persons