International Law and Immigration
Ca. Int'l Law Journal 2016, vol. 24, no. 2
Content
- A Personal Account of a Week Inside an Immigration Family Detention Center
- Brexit and the New Era in the Law of International Finance
- Contents
- Editor's Comments
- Global Legal Research
- Letter From the Chair of the International Law Section
- Masthead
- Practitioner's Spotlight: Professor Connie de la Vega
- Report by the Vietnam Lawyers Association on its Successful Visit with the State Bar of California International Law Section And Others
- Written Comments of Amicus Curiae, Before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Apple Inc. v. United States of America
- The European Union's New Trade Secrets Directive
The European Union’s New Trade Secrets Directive
By Emmanuelle Ragot*
I. INTRODUCTION
The unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure of trade secrets is a growing concern among companies in the European Union. According to a recent European Commission study, approximately 25 percent of European companies responding to a survey regarding trade secret use and protection stated that they "ha[d] suffered at least one attempt at misappropriation" between 2003 and 2013, and 38 percent stated that they believed the risk of such misappropriation had increased during that time period.1
Surprisingly, however, there is currently no unified EU framework for trade secret protection. Instead, trade secrets are governed by national laws, which are often outdated, unclear and contradictory. For example, trade secret laws in Germany, Finland, Greece, Denmark and Spain fail to clearly define trade secrets.2 Trade secret laws in many EU member states also suffer from significant loopholes.3 Further, some states, such as Belgium, France, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands and the UK, have no specific civil legislation regarding trade secrets at all. In these states, misappropriation claims are prosecuted under a variety of different legal theories, including extra-contractual liability, traditional common law and criminal law.4