Intellectual Property Law
New Matter WINTER 2015, Volume 40, Number 4
Content
- 2016 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- Case Comments
- Contents
- Digital Legacies: Who Owns Your Online Life After Death?
- Dmca's § 512(f) Remains Toothless in Light of Lenz Decision
- Intellectual Property Section Executive Committee 2015-2016
- Intellectual Property Section Interest Group Representatives 2015-2016
- International Ip Developments
- Letter from the Editor-in-Chief
- Licensing Interest Group
- MCLE Self-Study Article
- Open Licensing: Good for the Community, Good for Business
- Patent Interest Group
- Software Copyright and Innovation after Oracle v. Google
- The Licensing Corner
- The State Bar of California Intellectual Property Alumni
- Trade Secrets Interest Group
- Trademark Interest Group
- Ttab Decisions and Developments
- Letter from the Chair
Letter from the Chair
DEBORAH GREAVES
Ezra Brutzkus Gubner, LLP
DEAR SECTION MEMBERS:
It is with great honor and respect for my fellow practitioners that I assume the position of Chair of the Intellectual Property Law Section. As I write this inaugural letter, we are actively preparing for our 40th Annual IP Institute, the Section’s flagship program covering all things IP. Although the Institute will be behind us by the time this letter is published, we will continue to be immersed in preparing programs for 2016 and in to 2017.
Many Section members may not be aware that the primary mission of the Section is to provide continuing education and resources to our members. Publishing New Matter is one way we accomplish our goal. I highly recommend the articles as both illuminating on the subjects and with cross-relevance. For example, the article on New Media Rights by Teri Karobonik in this issue expounds on issues with Open Source Software, which become central to the plot detailed by James Roberts in his Licensing column. While we cannot always guarantee that New Matter will supply the background to each and every discussion in the same issue, we do strive for excellence. The Executive Committee of the Section takes its mission seriously and also devotes a great amount of thought and time into developing interesting programs with exceptional speakers. Although there may be competing providers of continuing education in the intellectual property realm, I continue to be amazed at the programming created by the Section and can state, without hesitation, that the subject matter and presentation is unsurpassed.