Intellectual Property Law
New Matter FALL 2018, Volume 43, Number 3
Content
- 2018 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- Contents
- Copyright News
- Everything You Need to Know About Foreign Patent Damages
- Federal Circuit Report
- Intellectual Property Section Executive Committee 2017-2018
- Intellectual Property Section Interest Group Representatives 2017-2018
- Ip and Art: An International Perspective
- Legislation Interest Group Report
- Letter from the Chair
- Letter from the Editor-in-Chief
- Ninth Circuit Report
- Online Cle For Participatory Credit
- Quarterly International Ip Law Update
- The California Lawyers Association Intellectual Property Alumni
- The Licensing Corner
- Ttab Decisions and Developments
- Case Comments
Case Comments
Lowell Anderson
Stetina Brunda Garred & Brucker
ANTITRUST
Sherman Act monopolization and attempted monopolizations claims have a four-year statute of limitations which may be tolled by a continuing conspiracy to violate the antitrust laws and for which the party asserting the claim has the burden of proof. Defendant failed to make a sufficient showing of a continuing conspiracy to avoid summary judgment so dismissal of the antitrust claims was affirmed. A jury finding that the patents were not proven invalid was also affirmed. XY, LLC v. Trans Ova Genetics, L.C., 890 F.3d 1282, 127 U.S.P.Q2d 1084 (Fed. Cir. 2018).