Environmental Law
Envt'l Law News SPRING 2021, VOL. 30, NO. 1
Content
- 2020-2021 Environmental Law Section Executive Committee
- Editor's Note . . .
- Environmental Law News Publications Committee
- La Posta Band of DiegueÑO Mission Indians V. Trump: Acknowledging and Addressing the Harm To Kumeyaay Tribes For Destruction of Their Homelands From the Border Wall Project
- Motivated, Active, and Learning: On Improving Diversity In the Practice of Environmental Law In California
- Opportunities and Requirements For Public Engagement In the Ceqa and General Plan Processes
- Reflections By Recipients of the Environmental Law Diversity & Inclusion Fellowship
- Table of Contents
- The 2020 Environmental Legislative Update: Pandemic Paralysis
- Implementing Gsps and Ceqa Review: Planning Today For Streamlined Groundwater Sustainability
IMPLEMENTING GSPS AND CEQA REVIEW: PLANNING TODAY FOR STREAMLINED GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY
By Sara F. Dudley*
I. INTRODUCTION
Seven years after the passage of the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act of 2014 ("SGMA") groundwater sustainability agencies ("GSA") have adopted – or soon will adopt – their groundwater sustainability plans. Groundwater sustainability plans ("GSP") are exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") but the activities that implement the plans likely are not. GSAs may be tempted to forgo or delay CEQA review, reasoning that it is too costly, too contentious, and unnecessary at this "early stage."
While this line of thinking is understandable, it could hinder achievement of SGMA’s goal of sustainable groundwater management by 2040 or 2042. An integrated approach to CEQA review can save GSAs precious time and money when implementing SGMA. It can also make GSAs more competitive in grant processes that rank projects more highly that are "shovel ready"-i.e., having completed environmental review.