Trusts and Estates
Ca. Trs. & Estates Quarterly Volume 14, Issue 4, Winter 2008
Content
- Alert Regarding Retroactivity of New Harmless Error Rule For Will Execution
- Family Vacation Homes: Planning With Qualified Conservation Contributions
- Legislative Update: Will the New No Contest Clause Legislation Prevent Fido From Contesting His Master's Will
- The Curious Case of Qprts: Underused and Underappreciated
- The Marital Deduction and Irc Sections 2511, 2519 and 2207A: a Three-headed Hydra
- The High-risk Will: Where Planning and Litigation Collide
THE HIGH-RISK WILL: WHERE PLANNING AND LITIGATION COLLIDE
By Charles M. Riffle* and Andrea Pierotti**
I. INTRODUCTION
It can be difficult for estate planners, who often are not litigators, to anticipate which of the instruments they draft will be contested, or how the instruments will be attacked. Moreover, estate planners sometimes need to act quickly to memorialize the client’s testamentary wishes, especially when faced with a dying client. This article provides guidance which estate planners can use when confronted with the daunting task of preparing estate planning documents for clients whose capacity may be questioned, or who may be alleged to be under the influence of others. The advice is from the perspective of the litigator who will be defending the validity of the instruments. By following the recommendations in this article, the planner can reduce the chances of a postmortem challenge to the instruments and, if a challenge is made, provide defense counsel with powerful evidence to defend the instruments.