Litigation
Cal. Litig. 2023, Volume 35, Issue 3
Content
- California's Commitment To Wage Transparency Comes At a Cost To Employers
- Confessions From An Electronic Platform 2022: Appellate Argument
- Disclosure of Litigation Funding Arrangements: Much Ado About Nothing
- Don't Let Your Client's Bequest Be a Lawsuit
- Fraud As Hyperreality
- From the Section Chair
- Governmental Entity Litigation: the Mirror Dimension
- New Federal Legislation Raises Dueling Experts: What Olean Might Mean For the Future of Class Certification In the Ninth Circuit
- PAST SECTION CHAIRS & EDITORS-IN-CHIEF
- Q & A WITH JUDGE VINCE CHHABRIA OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
- SECTION OFFICERS & EDITORIAL BOARD
- Smashing Statues: the Rise and Fall of America's Public Monuments
- Table of Contents
- The California Supreme Court In Judicial Year 2021-2022: Emerging From the Pandemic
- The Hastings College of the Law Name Change: the Real Deal About the Bad and the Ugly
- The Supreme Court's Five Arbitration Decisions
- Working: Conversations With Essential Workers
- Editor's Foreword
EDITOR’S FOREWORD
FOREWORD IS FOREARMED
Written by Benjamin G. Shatz
Editor-in-Chief
Your Editorial Board here at California Litigation thrives on feedback and letters to the editor. One especially meaningful letter comes from Sid Kanazawa at ARC in Los Angeles, who writes:
We hope that the issue you’re now reading will spur similar reactions. In the spirit that a foreword should forearm you, here’s what’s in store in the ensuing pages. We begin with Kirk Jenkins’s annual California Supreme Court review. No one puts in the time and crunches the numbers like Kirk—and we all get the benefit of his analysis. Be sure to check out his blog: CaliforniaSupremeCourtReview.com.