Labor and Employment Law
Ca. Labor & Emp't Rev. May 2021, Volume 35, No. 3
Content
- Labor & Employment Law Section Executive Committee 2020-2021
- California Employment Law Notes
- Cases Pending Before the California Supreme Court
- Inside the Law Review
- Masthead
- McLe Self-Study: the New Abc's of California Employment Law
- McLe Self-Study: Vazquez's Retroactivity Holding Creates Unintended Consequences For Independent Contractors
- Message From the Chair
- Nlra Case Notes
- Public Sector Case Notes
- Wage and Hour Case Notes
- Mediation Tips and Arbitration Bits
MEDIATION TIPS AND ARBITRATION BITS
By Alan R. Berkowitz
Alan R. Berkowitz is a mediator with Judicate West, specializing in individual and class action cases. He has resolved hundreds of cases involving all types of employment matters, including wage and hour class actions and PAGA claims, many of which resulted in seven-to-eight-figure settlements. Before retiring from the practice of law to become a full-time mediator, he was a partner with Bingham McCutchen, managing partner with Schachter Kristoff Orenstein and Berkowitz, and Regional Attorney at the NLRB, Region 32. He has tried over 50 cases in state and federal courts and administrative agencies on behalf of both defendants and plaintiffs.
SOME ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN MEDIATION
Do current ethical rules require attorneys to be truthful in mediation? Rule 3.3 of the California Rules of Professional Conduct, "Candor Toward the Tribunal," prohibits lawyers from making a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal. But the term "tribunal" applies only to a court, arbitrator, or other body acting in an adjudicative capacity authorized to make a binding decision on the parties. On its face, rule 3.3 is inapplicable to mediations or to statements made to an opposing party. However, another rule has a much broader scope and does apply to statements made to a mediator and to an adversary.