Intellectual Property Law
New Matter SUMMER 2022, VOLUME 47, EDITION 2
- 2022 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- Becoming More Like California? a Potential National Movement Towards Restricting the Use of Non-competes
- Copyright Commons
- Federal Circuit Column
- INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECTION Executive Committee 2021-2022
- INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECTION Interest Group Representatives 2021-2022
- Intellectual Property Section New Matter Editorial Board
- Larry G. Junker V. Medical Components, and Martech Medical Products, Inc.
- Letter From the Chair
- Letter From the Editor-in-chief
- My Ai Did It: Intermediary Liability For Ai?
- Online Cle For Participatory Credit
- Quarterly International Ip Law Update
- Russia Permits Uncompensated Use of Certain Patents and Future of Russian Patents
- Table of Contents
- The California Lawyers Association Intellectual Property Alumni
- THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION IN UNICOLORS, INC. V. H&M HENNES & MAURITZ, L.P. ELIMINATES A TRAP FOR UNWARY COPYRIGHT APPLICANTS
- Trade Secret Report
- Ttab Decisions and Developments
- What's Happening In Russia—Should Ip Rightsholders Be Concerned?
- Ninth Circuit Report
NINTH CIRCUIT REPORT
Happy summer, Ninth Circuit Report readers! This issue’s Ninth Circuit Report provides an update on the case heard by the U.S. Supreme Court that originated in the Ninth Circuit: Unicolors, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, LP. In Unicolors, the Supreme Court considered an intra-circuit conflict in the application of a federal statute. On February 24, 2022, the Supreme Court vacated the Ninth Circuit’s holding.
NINTH CIRCUIT OPINION SUMMARY
A more detailed account of this case is offered in last issue’s Ninth Circuit Report, which I am briefly summarizing here for those that didn’t catch the last issue.