Intellectual Property Law
New Matter SUMMER 2021, Volume 46, Number 2
Content
- 2021 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- A Look at the Trademark Modernization Act: Early Observations of a Bold New Law
- Cla Staff
- Claiming Priority in the Epo
- Contents
- Copyright News
- Editorial Board
- Enablement of Prior Art Under 35 U.S.C. § 103
- "Failure To Function" When that Catchy Slogan You ♥ is Not a Mark At All
- Federal Circuit Report
- Intellectual Property Section Executive Committee 2019-2021
- Intellectual Property Section Interest Group Representatives 2019-2021
- Ip and Art: An International Perspective
- Letter from the Chair
- Letter from the Editor-in-Chief
- McLe Self-Study Article
- Ninth Circuit Report
- Online Cle For Participatory Credit
- Quarterly International Ip Law Update
- Recognizing California's Notable Dtsa Cases in Honor of Dtsa's 5th Birthday
- The California Lawyers Association Intellectual Property Alumni
- Trade Secret Report
- Ttab Decisions and Developments
- The Licensing Corner
The Licensing Corner
John Pavolotsky
Intel Corporation
POTENTIAL PITFALLS (AND SOLUTIONS) IN TECHNOLOGY LICENSING AGREEMENTS
Words are tools of the trade for attorneys, and, perhaps, especially for those specializing in technology licensing agreements. The IP indemnification provision, ubiquitous in technology license agreements, represents the perfect crucible for forging language that will reflect the intent of the parties and withstand the test of time.