Intellectual Property Law
New Matter SUMMER 2015 Volume 40, Number 2
Content
- Patent Interest Group
- The Moral of B&B Hardware: Companies Need to Be Strategic in Trademark Actions Before the Ttab
- Intellectual Property Section Executive Committee 2014-2015
- Intellectual Property Section Interest Group Representatives 2014-2015
- Letter from the Chair
- The State Bar of California Intellectual Property Alumni
- MCLE Self-Study Article
- Civil Case on Redskins Heats Up: Pro-Football, Inc. v. Amanda Blackhorse, et al.
- Trademark Interest Group
- The Licensing Corner
- Newsflash
- Copyright Interest Group
- Federal Circuit Review
- Runaway jurisprudence: Has the "But For" Test for Proving Inequitable Conduct in Patent Cases Gone Awry, Gone Rogue, or Gone Quiet?
- Litigation Interest Group
- Patently "Wrong:" Scotus rules that the Federal Circuit has Misused the "De Novo" Standard when Reviewing Claim Construction Determinations
- Case Comments
- Legislation Update
- Entertainment and Sports Law Interest Group
- International Ip Developments
- Letter from the Editor-in-Chief
- Licensing Interest Group
- Ninth Circuit Report
- 2015 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- Contents
The Licensing Corner
JAMES C. ROBERTS III Global Capital Law Group PC
MONKEY SELFIES AND LONDON RED BUSES
Licensees expect the licensor to represent and warrant that the licensor holds the rights necessary to grant the relevant license. What happens when the underlying rights change after the license agreement is signed? Two recent stories about Indonesian black macaques and the fabled London red buses got me to thinking.