Intellectual Property Law
New Matter SPRING 2020, Volume 45, Number 1
Content
- Broad Institute Crispr: Epo Patent Revocation Lessons for Claiming Priority to Provisional Applications
- 2020 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- Federal Circuit Report
- MCLE Self-Study Article: Bubble, Bubble, Oil-no Trouble?
- Ip and Art: An International Perspective
- AmGen: Markush Practice in 2020
- Ttab Decisions and Developments
- Case Comments
- Upcoming Events
- Intellectual Property Section Interest Group Representatives 2019-2020
- Intellectual Property Section Executive Committee 2019-2020
- Quarterly International Ip Law Update
- Letter from the Editor-in-Chief
- MCLE Self-Study Article: Ethics of Social Media For Lawyers: Where Stunting For the Gram Meets Losing Your Bar Card
- Copyright News
- Contents
- Ninth Circuit Report
- Letter from the Chair
- The Licensing Corner
- The California Lawyers Association Intellectual Property Alumni
- Online Cle For Participatory Credit
TTAB Decisions and Developments
Jane Shay Wald
Irell & Manella LLP
If You Run Out Of Time And You Can’t Follow Up And Argue The Info You Wanted Was Meta If The Board Disagrees And You Can’t Swallow Up The New Inquiry Into The Old, It’s No Betta
The Board denied an Opposer’s motion to compel production of "metadata," finding that because Opposer had not requested the metadata information in its production requests, the Applicant did not need to provide it. Here, Opposer filed a notice of opposition to Applicant’s intent-to-use application to register the mark LIFE IS BETTER AT THE RACE TRACK for clothing and accessories in classes 14, 18 and 25, alleging priority and likelihood of confusion.