Intellectual Property Law
New Matter SPRING 2020, Volume 45, Number 1
Content
- 2020 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- AmGen: Markush Practice in 2020
- Broad Institute Crispr: Epo Patent Revocation Lessons for Claiming Priority to Provisional Applications
- Case Comments
- Contents
- Copyright News
- Federal Circuit Report
- Intellectual Property Section Executive Committee 2019-2020
- Intellectual Property Section Interest Group Representatives 2019-2020
- Ip and Art: An International Perspective
- Letter from the Chair
- Letter from the Editor-in-Chief
- MCLE Self-Study Article: Bubble, Bubble, Oil-no Trouble?
- MCLE Self-Study Article: Ethics of Social Media For Lawyers: Where Stunting For the Gram Meets Losing Your Bar Card
- Ninth Circuit Report
- Online Cle For Participatory Credit
- Quarterly International Ip Law Update
- The California Lawyers Association Intellectual Property Alumni
- The Licensing Corner
- Upcoming Events
- Ttab Decisions and Developments
TTAB Decisions and Developments
Jane Shay Wald
Irell & Manella LLP
If You Run Out Of Time And You Can’t Follow Up And Argue The Info You Wanted Was Meta If The Board Disagrees And You Can’t Swallow Up The New Inquiry Into The Old, It’s No Betta
The Board denied an Opposer’s motion to compel production of "metadata," finding that because Opposer had not requested the metadata information in its production requests, the Applicant did not need to provide it. Here, Opposer filed a notice of opposition to Applicant’s intent-to-use application to register the mark LIFE IS BETTER AT THE RACE TRACK for clothing and accessories in classes 14, 18 and 25, alleging priority and likelihood of confusion.