Intellectual Property Law
New Matter FALL 2015 Volume 40, Number 3
Content
- 2015 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- Case Comments
- Contents
- Copyright Interest Group
- Entertainment and Sports Law Interest Group
- Finding a Place for Mallinckrodt and Conditional Sales in the Patent Exhaustion Doctrine: Will "Lex" Mark the Spot?
- Intellectual Property Section Executive Committee 2014-2015
- Intellectual Property Section Interest Group Representatives 2014-2015
- International Interest Group
- International Ip Developments
- Letter from the Chair
- Letter from the Editor-in-Chief
- Licensing Interest Group
- Litigation Interest Group
- MCLE Self-Study Article
- Patent Interest Group
- Patent Trolling in the Wake of the Octane Fitness Case
- Report of the Delegation of the intellectual Property Law Section of the State Bar of California to Washington, D.C. April 20-22, 2015
- The Licensing Corner
- The Role of Design Patents, Copyright and Trade Dress in Protecting the Next Generation of inventions
- The State Bar of California Intellectual Property Alumni
- Trade Secrets Interest Group
- Trademark Interest Group
- Ninth Circuit Report
Ninth Circuit Report
ANNE-MARIE DAD Miclean Gleason LLP
Welcome td the Fall edition dp New Matter. I hope that everyone had a fantastic summer, and is having a great start to the Fall season. This Ninth Circuit Report brings back a familiar case, and hopefully brings us some closure in the area of Copyright law.
CASE UPDATE: GARCIA V. GOOGLE
New Matter’s Summer 2014 and Winter 2015 editions featured a discussion on the Garcia v. Google case, discussing a YouTube takedown notice. The case involves copyright law with significant implications on free speech.