Intellectual Property Law
New Matter FALL 2014, Volume 39, Number 3
Content
- 2014 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- Case Comments
- Cheerleading Uniforms and Copyright Separability
- Contents
- Copyright Interest Group
- Design PatentsāTaking a Closer Look at These Valuable Assets
- Entertainment and Sports Law Interest Group
- In a Split Decision the Ttab Finds Redskins Disparaging Blackhorse v. Pro-Football, Inc. Cancellation No. 92046185 (T.T.a.B. June 18, 2014)
- Intellectual Property Section Executive Committee 2013-2014
- Intellectual Property Section Interest Group Representatives 2013-2014
- International Ip Developments
- Letter from the Chair
- Letter from the Editor-in-Chief
- Licensing Interest Group
- Litigation Interest Group
- MCLE Self-Study Article
- Monsanto and Myriad: Is the Supreme Court Rendering Consistent Decisions When it Comes to Human Versus Non-Human Gene Patentability?
- Ninth Circuit Report
- Patent Interest Group
- Preparing to Defend a Section 337 Action: What District Court Litigators Need to Know
- Raising Healthy Patents
- The Law of the Land
- Trademark Interest Group
- Uncle Sam Wants You! a Call to Pro Bono Service for Patent Practitioners
- The Licensing Corner
The Licensing Corner
James C. Roberts III
Global Capital Law Group PC
ODDBALL DRAFTING
Every once in awhile an agreement crosses my desk with "odd" provisions—language that makes me say "Huh?" It does not matter that thorough explanations and reasonable fixes are a few mouse-clicks away from anyone; weird provisions still seem to appear. So, in this column, I will explore a few of them that have occurred in recent times more than once. For those of you with long memories, you might recall some of these oddballs have been the topic of this column, but here I want to explore them with a weathered eye toward drafting.