Intellectual Property Law
New Matter FALL 2014, Volume 39, Number 3
Content
- 2014 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- Case Comments
- Cheerleading Uniforms and Copyright Separability
- Contents
- Copyright Interest Group
- Design Patents—Taking a Closer Look at These Valuable Assets
- Entertainment and Sports Law Interest Group
- In a Split Decision the Ttab Finds Redskins Disparaging Blackhorse v. Pro-Football, Inc. Cancellation No. 92046185 (T.T.a.B. June 18, 2014)
- Intellectual Property Section Executive Committee 2013-2014
- Intellectual Property Section Interest Group Representatives 2013-2014
- International Ip Developments
- Letter from the Editor-in-Chief
- Licensing Interest Group
- Litigation Interest Group
- MCLE Self-Study Article
- Monsanto and Myriad: Is the Supreme Court Rendering Consistent Decisions When it Comes to Human Versus Non-Human Gene Patentability?
- Ninth Circuit Report
- Patent Interest Group
- Preparing to Defend a Section 337 Action: What District Court Litigators Need to Know
- Raising Healthy Patents
- The Law of the Land
- The Licensing Corner
- Trademark Interest Group
- Uncle Sam Wants You! a Call to Pro Bono Service for Patent Practitioners
- Letter from the Chair
Letter from the Chair
Andrew W. Stroud
Hanson Bridgett LLP
THE RESULTS ARE IN
In my last letter I noted that several intellectual property cases were on the Supreme Court’s docket for this term, showing the increasing importance of intellectual property, not only as a practice area, but in our daily lives. Well, the term has now concluded and ‘the results are in.’ I am sure many hours will be spent attempting to discern new patterns in the Court’s thinking that will assist IP practitioners in the next few years. I am willing to add my two cents to what has been and will be written.