Trusts and Estates
Ca. Trs. & Estates Quarterly 2019, Volume 25, Issue 3
Content
- Chairs of Section Subcommittees
- Editorial Board
- From the Chair
- From the Editors-in-chief
- Inside this Issue:
- Litigation Alert
- MCLE Article: How To Get Rid of a Dead Body
- Tax Issues When Settling a Trust or Estate Dispute: a Guide For the Litigator
- Tips of the Trade: the Formula General Power of Appointment: Guaranteed Efficiency Between Estate Tax Planning and Income Tax Basis
- Urick V. Urick: (Re)Opening the Floodgates of Trust Contests
- Both Attorney and Trustee: Doubling Down or a Bad Bet?
BOTH ATTORNEY AND TRUSTEE: DOUBLING DOWN OR A BAD BET?
By Patrick A. Kohlmann, Esq. & Jennifer F. Scharre, Esq.*
INTRODUCTION
Estate planning attorneys routinely find themselves counseling their clients to carefully select an "appropriate" successor trustee. Occasionally, either out of admiration for the attorney or, more likely, exasperation with family members, clients ask their drafting attorney to serve as trustee. After all, who better than the drafting attorney? Most attorneys politely decline and redirect the conversation. But some may not. What are the implications of agreeing to this proposal? Is it ethical? Is a "lawyer/trustee" placed in a position of irreconcilable conflict?
This article addresses the pitfalls and cautionary tales that an attorney should be aware of before accepting a client’s proposal to act as a trustee. It also provides practitioners with a roadmap to contest such an appointment when representing the dismayed beneficiary who has learned a parent’s attorney is now serving as trustee.