Public Law
Public Law Journal: Winter 2014, Vol. 37, No. 1
Content
- Enter the Public Law Section Student Writing Competition-deadline May 12
- Legislation Update
- Litigation & Case Law Update
- Masthead
- Message from the Chair
- Police Liability for Tactical Conduct Preceding the Use of Force-the Implications of Hayes v. County of San Diego
- Public Lawyer of the Year Nominations Sought
- Substandard Designs and Better Technology-New Developments in Design Immunity
- The Public Law Section 2014 Student Writing Competition
- Municipal Condemnation of Mortgage Loans
Municipal Condemnation of Mortgage Loans
By John Vlahoplus*
INTRODUCTION
Cities across California and the nation are considering using their powers of eminent domain to purchase both performing and defaulted underwater mortgage loans (those whose principal balance exceeds the value of the encumbered home). They seek to reduce principal on the loans in order to minimize defaults, short sales and foreclosures, and thereby to mitigate the broad community costs of the negative equity crisis (the "Municipal Plan"). Many cities are specifically considering purchasing loans held in private securitization trusts, which do not benefit from any federal government guarantees.
The Municipal Plan is certainly controversial, and opponents have raised constitutional challenges and criticized it as poor policy, as unlikely to achieve its stated goals, and as providing significant benefits for private parties (including private parties that fund the loan purchases or advise cities).1 This essay considers the applicable law in the context of the principal legal challenges to the Municipal Plan.