Litigation
Cal. Litig. 2022, VOLUME 35, ISSUE 2
Content
- A Conversation With Ninth Circuit Judge John B. Owens
- Advanced Topics In Appellate Practice: the Path of Mastery
- Editor's Foreword
- From the Section Chair
- How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights Is Tearing America Apart
- It's Time To Fix Our Broken Discovery Civil Culture
- LITIGATION v. TRANSACTIONAL WORK: WHO'S THE "REAL LAWYER"?
- New Federal Legislation Raises Multiple Questions Regarding Litigation of Sexual Abuse and Sexual Harassment Cases and Affects Recent State Legislation
- PAST SECTION CHAIRS & EDITORS-IN-CHIEF
- SECTION OFFICERS & EDITORIAL BOARD
- Table of Contents
- Tell It To the Judge ... or the Jury ... or the Arbitrator? Before You Tell Your Story ... Know Your Audience!
- The Power of Arbitrators To Decide Arbitrability — Delegation Clauses and Lessons From Caselaw
- U.S. v. NIXON, 50 YEARS LATER
- When May a Court Compel An Individual (Or Representative) Paga Claim To Arbitration?
- The Crest Opinions: Impeding Legislative Efforts To Diversify Corporate Boards
THE CREST OPINIONS: IMPEDING LEGISLATIVE EFFORTS TO DIVERSIFY CORPORATE BOARDS
Written by Rachel Naor*
It’s no secret that most directors on corporate boards in the United States are white men â in 2021, approximately 60% of the board seats at S&P 500 companies were occupied by white men. Several states have tried to address this issue by enacting legislation aimed at increasing board diversity. California was the first state to impose gender diversity on boards when it passed Women on Boards (Senate Bill (SB) 826) in 2018, mandating corporations with executive offices in California to have at least one woman on their board by December 2019 and to add more women in subsequent years. In 2020, California expanded its efforts to increase board member diversity and passed Assembly Bill (AB) 979, mandating those same corporations include at least one director from an underrepresented community by December 31, 2021.
In April 2022, L.A. Superior Court Judge Terry Green ruled that AB 979 was unconstitutional when he granted the plaintiff’s summary judgment motion. The following month, Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis of the same court determined that SB 826 was unconstitutional following a six-week trial. In addition to being a setback to the efforts in California, these rulings pose new obstacles to other existing and contemplated legislation designed to increase board diversity.