Intellectual Property Law

New Matter SUMMER 2017, Volume 41, Number 3

Enhanced Patent Damages: The "Halo Effect"

Robert W. Payne

Payne IP Law

Few areas in intellectual property law have suffered more ninety-degree turns than the subject of enhanced patent damages. On June 13, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court set the newest course in a dramatic fashion – in Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.1 and its companion case, Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc.2 Federal Circuit bright-line authority was rejected.

If found liable in a patent infringement case, an infringer may be enjoined from activity, and may also be liable for damages. Damages may be actual damages proved by the plaintiff, but in no case may they be less than a reasonable royalty.3 Under certain circumstances, the Court may enhance damages up to a trebling of the underlying damage amount.4 This is set forth in 35 U.S.C. § 284, which provides:

Join CLA to access this page

Join Now

Forgot Password

Enter the email associated with you account. You will then receive a link in your inbox to reset your password.

Personal Information

Select Section(s)

CLA Membership is $99 and includes one section. Additional sections are $99 each.