Intellectual Property Law
New Matter FALL 2023, VOLUME 48, EDITION 3
Content
- 2023 Dc Delegation Trip Report
- 2023 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- ANDY WARHOL FOUNDATION FOR THE VISUAL ARTS V. GOLDSMITH: Expanding the Degree of Similarity—Trimming Transformative Use
- Federal Circuit Report
- INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECTION Executive Committee 2022-2023
- INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECTION Interest Group Representatives 2022-2023
- Intellectual Property Section New Matter Editorial Board
- IS ALL FAIR IN POP ART AND CELEBRITY PHOTOGRAPHY (PART II)? In Which the Justices Turn to Economics to Level the Playing Field for Human Creatives
- Letter From the Chair
- Letter From the Editor-in-chief
- Mickey Mouse and the Public Domain
- Mitigating Ai Bias With Responsible Ai Design
- Ninth Circuit Report
- Online Cle For Participatory Credit
- Patentability of Artificial Intelligence On the Precipice of Reform
- Quarterly International Ip Law Update
- Recent Disqualification Precedent Raises Interesting Questions About Computer Access and Data Rights
- Six Things To Know About the California Privacy Rights Act
- Table of Contents
- The California Lawyers Association Intellectual Property Alumni
- The Licensing Corner
- Trade Secret Report
- Ttab Decisions and Developments
- DARRABY GLIB NOTES™ Andy Warhol Foundation Supreme Court Opinion: Highlights And Sound Bites
DARRABY GLIB NOTESâ„¢1 Andy Warhol Foundation Supreme Court Opinion: Highlights And Sound Bites
Alexandra Darraby
Art Law Firm
The U.S. Supreme Court in May 2023 affirmed the Second Circuit’s determination that the Andy Warhol Foundation’s licensing one Warhol image from the Warhol Prince series to a magazine commemorating the musician Prince was not fair use of defendant Goldberg’s copyrighted original photograph that she licensed to magazines for the same purpose.2The following are selected FAQs.