Intellectual Property Law
New Matter FALL 2023, VOLUME 48, EDITION 3
Content
- 2023 Dc Delegation Trip Report
- 2023 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- ANDY WARHOL FOUNDATION FOR THE VISUAL ARTS V. GOLDSMITH: Expanding the Degree of Similarity—Trimming Transformative Use
- DARRABY GLIB NOTES™ Andy Warhol Foundation Supreme Court Opinion: Highlights And Sound Bites
- Federal Circuit Report
- INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECTION Executive Committee 2022-2023
- INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECTION Interest Group Representatives 2022-2023
- Intellectual Property Section New Matter Editorial Board
- IS ALL FAIR IN POP ART AND CELEBRITY PHOTOGRAPHY (PART II)? In Which the Justices Turn to Economics to Level the Playing Field for Human Creatives
- Letter From the Chair
- Letter From the Editor-in-chief
- Mickey Mouse and the Public Domain
- Mitigating Ai Bias With Responsible Ai Design
- Ninth Circuit Report
- Online Cle For Participatory Credit
- Patentability of Artificial Intelligence On the Precipice of Reform
- Quarterly International Ip Law Update
- Recent Disqualification Precedent Raises Interesting Questions About Computer Access and Data Rights
- Six Things To Know About the California Privacy Rights Act
- Table of Contents
- The California Lawyers Association Intellectual Property Alumni
- Trade Secret Report
- Ttab Decisions and Developments
- The Licensing Corner
THE LICENSING CORNER
Sean Hogle
Rooney Nimmo PC
THIRD PARTY IPR INFRINGEMENT ADDITIONAL REMEDIES CLAUSE
In software, technology and other intellectual property license agreements, the parties frequently negotiate the terms of an infringement indemnification or defense of claims clause. The licensor, seller, provider, or developer of technology, SaaS, or technical services (for ease of reference, "seller"), promises that if the licensee, buyer, or user ("buyer") becomes the defendant in a lawsuit, claiming that the buyer’s use of the seller’s technology is infringing, the seller will step in and indemnify and/or defend the buyer against that claim.