Business Law
Business Law News 2019, Issue 4
Content
- 2019 Bankruptcy Truisms: "Rejection" of an Executory Contract Means "Breach," and Not "Rescission," and a Trademark Is Not a Type of Intellectual Property
- An Artistic Defense to Claims of Trademark Infringement: Examining the Lawsuit Over Netflix's Use of "Choose Your Own Adventure" Phrase in the Interactive Film Black Mirror: Bandersnatch
- Bln Editorial Board: Letter from the Issue Editor
- Business Law News Editorial Team
- Cannabis Clients-High Times, or Buzz Kill?
- Executive Committee: Message from the Chair
- Executive Committee of the Business Law Section 2019-2020
- Gordon K. Davidson Receives Business Law Section's 2019 Lifetime Achievement Award
- #MeToo—Can It Be Used as an Excuse? Frustration of Purpose and Other Theories Used to Excuse Performance in Entertainment and Business Deals
- Standing Committee Officers of the Business Law Section 2019-2020
- Table of Contents
- Tech Employers Be Ready: Understanding Changes to California's Harassment and Hostile Work Environment Laws
- Are 'Bad' Marks Good for Business? Implications of the Supreme Court's Approval of Scandalous & Immoral Trademarks
Are ‘Bad’ Marks Good for Business? Implications of the Supreme Court’s Approval of Scandalous & Immoral Trademarks
Vera Golosker
Vera Golosker is Counsel, Business & Legal Affairs at Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, where she works on development in the unscripted television division. Vera is Vice Chair of the Association of Media and Entertainment Counsel’s Emerging Leaders Board and Chair Emeritus of the IP Section of the Beverly Hills Bar Association.
Introduction
As companies strive to stand out to catch consumers’ attention, a risqué brand name may just do the trick. Whether attracted or offended, potential customers are likely to notice a salacious mark, and, after a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision, companies can now register a scandalous brand name without running afoul of federal trademark law.