Sheen v. Wells Fargo Bank (2022) _ Cal.5th _ , 2022 WL 664722: The California Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's order sustaining defendant's demurrer to plaintiff's cause of action alleging negligence in defendant's responses to plaintiff's loan modification requests. Read more
In recent years, association controls on a homeowner’s right to rent, the duration of a rental, and rental caps have been severely weakened, both in case law and by statute. Read more
When Elizabeth Blair and I brainstormed an event primarily focused on wellness, we wanted to try something new. Rather than having attendees sit in a room all day without much opportunity to network or get up and move, we wanted to appeal to a broader, younger audience. Our goal was to shift the dynamic of what a legal conference could be. Read more
League to Save Lake Tahoe Mountain Area v. City of Placer (2022) _ Cal.App.5th _ , 2022 WL 442815: The Court of Appeal affirmed, in part, two judgments of the trial court in two actions alleging that respondent's approval of approval of a land use specific plan and rezoning to permit residential and commercial development and preserve forest land near Truckee and Lake Tahoe, did not comply with the California Environmental Quality Act Read more
On April 22-24, 2022, the CLA Real Property Law Section will be hosting its first annual Real Property Health & Wellness Retreat at the fabulous Ritz Carlton, Lake Tahoe. We are excited that this will be the first event for our section to be focused primarily on wellness MCLE seminars and activities over substantive property law content. When Elizabeth Blair and I brainstormed this event, our goal was to break away from the typical tedious MCLE conference where attendees would be sitting in a room all day without much opportunity to network or get up and move. We wanted to appeal to a broader, younger audience, and shift the dynamic of what a legal conference could be. Read more
In the case of Greif v. Sanin, (2022), 74 Cal.App.5th 412, California’s Fourth Appellate District decided that in the sale of vacant land a real estate licensee representing the buyer exclusively had no common law duty to inform an unrepresented seller that the purchase price was below fair market value. In and of itself, that holding is not surprising. After all, even prior to this case what real estate attorney would tell a buyer’s exclusive agent that the agent has a duty to inform the seller that the buyer is getting a good deal, or even a “steal?” After all, doing so might be a breach of the buyer’s exclusive agent’s fiduciary duty to the agent’s own client. Read more
Online marketing is critical for all attorneys, especially now, as we shelter at home, and the amount of time potential clients spend online increases exponentially. During the hour long webinar, we will discuss effective strategies for online business development and provide an understanding of best practices in social media and web-based marketing during COVID-19 and beyond. Kristen will also address the California Rules of Professional Conduct as they pertain to attorney advertising while exploring what make sense from a marketing perspective and what is legal from an ethics perspective. Read more
Award Homes, Inc. v. County of San Benito (2021) _ Cal.App.5th _ , 2021 WL 5631443: The Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment for defendant in an action by plaintiff developer for a determination that it was not required to pay amounts required under tax sharing agreements between defendant and the City of Hollister. Tax sharing agreements between defendant and the City of Hollister required the city to pay defendant a fixed fee Read more