Trusts and Estates
Ca. Trs. & Estates Quarterly Volume 13, Issue 1, Spring 2007
Content
- A Claim Is a Claim Is a Claim: Post-death Events and Section 2053 Deductions
- Does Your Elder Have Standing?
- Donating Real Property To Charity
- New Probate Code Section 6132—An Improvement or Just a Stimulus For Litigation
- Out of State, Out of Mind? Not So For Conservators Since Hume.
- Trustee's Million Dollar Question: Who Is Entitled To Notice of Trust Administration?
- Sleepless Nights For Estate Planning Attorneys: What To Do About the Care Custodian Statute
SLEEPLESS NIGHTS FOR ESTATE PLANNING ATTORNEYS: WHAT TO DO ABOUT THE CARE CUSTODIAN STATUTE
By Neil F. Horton*
I. INTRODUCTION
Estate planning attorneys should worry about naming non-family members as beneficiaries under their clients’ revocable trusts and wills. A gift to a non-family member may be an invalid gift to a "disqualified person" under Probate Code section 21350. That section invalidates any provision in an instrument making a donative transfer from a "dependent adult" to a "care custodian."1 The terms "dependent adult" and "care custodian" are so broad as to threaten the validity of most gifts from clients over age 64 to non-family members.
This article will (a) analyze the broad statutory definitions of "dependent adult" and "care custodian," (b) list the exceptions that apply to validate certain gifts from dependent adults to care custodians, (c) examine the exception relating to a certificate of independent review,2 (d) look at the meager alternative methods for carrying out the wishes of a client who wants to make a testamentary gift to one who arguably is a care custodian, and (e) mention the prospects for legislative relief.