Public Law
Public Law Journal: 2023, VOLUME 45, NUMBER 1
Content
- 2022-2023 Executive Committee of the Real Property Law Section
- 2022-2023 Public Law Executive Committee
- BEHIND THE WORDS OF THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® RESIDENTIAL PURCHASE AGREEMENT: LEGAL AND PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS
- How Public Agencies Can Reduce Blight and Generate Revenue With Civil Litigation
- Letter From the California Real Property Editor
- Letter From the Public Law Section Chair
- Letter From the Public Law Section Editor
- Moncharsh and the Risk of Arbitration
- Public Law Case Updates
- Public Law Editorial Board
- Public Lawyer Spotlight: Charles Bell, Jr., City Attorney For the City of National City
- Real Property Editorial Board
- Recent Rpls Enews Articles
- U.S. Supreme Court Issues First Amendment Decisions Impacting Sign Regulations and Flag Policies
- Inside This Issue
INSIDE THIS ISSUE
MONCHARSH AND THE RISK OF ARBITRATION
By John P. McGill
This article considers the Supreme Court’s 1992 Moncharsh v Heily & Blase decision that effectively authorizes arbitrators to make errors of law and fact in their decisions, even when it results in substantial injustice. It is time for the Court to revisit Moncharsh and overrule it.
[PAGE 7]
HOW PUBLIC AGENCIES CAN REDUCE BLIGHT AND GENERATE REVENUE WITH CIVIL LITIGATION
By Ryan Griffith
Almost every city and county has dilapidated properties that blight neighborhoods for years. Neighbors expect that public agencies will remedy such blight, and Neighborhood Law Programs are a proven method for doing so.
[PAGE 25]
PUBLIC LAWYER SPOTLIGHT: CHARLES BELL, JR., CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
By Public Law Journal Editors
This month’s Spotlight celebrates the public law service of Charles Bell, Jr. On June 3, 2022, Governor Gavin Newsom appointed Charles Bell, Jr. to serve as a Judge in the San Diego County Superior Court.
[PAGE 28]
U.S. SUPREME COURT ISSUES FIRST AMENDMENT DECISIONS IMPACTING SIGN REGULATIONS AND FLAG POLICIES
By Matthew Richardson, Scott Smith, and Ryan Stager
Municipalities throughout the country regulate signs and set policy for flag-flying on public property. This article examines two recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions: one provides clarity on local sign regulations that do (and do not) trigger strict scrutiny; and the second highlights what not to do when allowing private groups to fly flags on public property.
[PAGE 30]