Litigation
Cal. Litig. 2023, Volume 36, Issue 2
Content
- A Litigator's Guide To Vacatur: Overturning An Arbitration Award
- A Trial Lawyer In Full: the Life and Career of James J. Brosnahan
- Are You Savvy About Arbitration?
- California's Gun Purchase Waiting Period: a History of the Future
- Editor's Foreword
- Five Non-legal Books Every Young Litigator Should Read
- From the Section Chair
- Meet Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett (C.D. Cal.)
- PAST SECTION CHAIRS & EDITORS-IN-CHIEF
- SECTION OFFICERS & EDITORIAL BOARD
- Table of Contents
- The Need To Update California's International Arbitration Code
- What's Next With the Client Trust Accounting Protection Program?
- Why I Did It the Way I Did It
- You Are Not An American: Citizenship From Dred Scott To the Dreamers
- The Best Way To Destroy An Enemy Is To Make Him a Friend
THE BEST WAY TO DESTROY AN ENEMY IS TO MAKE HIM A FRIEND
Written by Sidney Kanazawa*
"Zealous advocacy" often blinds us to possibilities that are right before us. To see them, we may need to change how we perceive ourselves and our opponents.
When she was on the bench, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Mary House (ret.), once faced two incessantly combative lawyers who each claimed entitlement to $40,000 in sanctions against the other. Rather than decide their reciprocal discovery motions, she ordered the two attorneys to have lunch together, to ask a set of questions about each other, and to report back at 1:30 p.m. They balked but after lunch they sent a note to Judge House’s clerk that they had settled the case. A year later, they visited Judge House’s chambers to let her know that they and their families had become friends and were now vacationing together on a regular basis.
Born out of courage, the concept of "zealous advocacy" advances a noble goal of client loyalty that is sometimes distorted into justifying bullying, hiding, posturing, rudeness, and other competitive behavior. In the name of "zealous advocacy," some attorneys (and clients) feel compelled to treat opponents as "enemies" and are uncomfortable befriending and collaborating with opponents to harmonize competing viewpoints â a misunderstanding of our practical role as lawyers and how we can most effectively perform that role.