Litigation
Cal. Litig. 2023, Volume 36, Issue 2
Content
- A Litigator's Guide To Vacatur: Overturning An Arbitration Award
- A Trial Lawyer In Full: the Life and Career of James J. Brosnahan
- Are You Savvy About Arbitration?
- Editor's Foreword
- Five Non-legal Books Every Young Litigator Should Read
- From the Section Chair
- Meet Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett (C.D. Cal.)
- PAST SECTION CHAIRS & EDITORS-IN-CHIEF
- SECTION OFFICERS & EDITORIAL BOARD
- Table of Contents
- The Best Way To Destroy An Enemy Is To Make Him a Friend
- The Need To Update California's International Arbitration Code
- What's Next With the Client Trust Accounting Protection Program?
- Why I Did It the Way I Did It
- You Are Not An American: Citizenship From Dred Scott To the Dreamers
- California's Gun Purchase Waiting Period: a History of the Future
CALIFORNIA’S GUN PURCHASE WAITING PERIOD: A HISTORY OF THE FUTURE
Written by Bill Slomanson*
DÉJÀ VU
California’s gun purchase waiting period was first litigated in 2011. That case migrated from a Fresno federal trial court to the U.S. Supreme Court. (Silvester v. Becerra (2018) 138 S.Ct. 945.) A fresh attack was filed in San Diego’s federal district court in May 2023. (Richards v. Bonta (S.D.Cal., May 1, 2023, No. 3:23-CV-00793) [hereafter Richards].)
The Fresno trial court overturned the state’s waiting period. (Silvester v. Harris (E.D.Cal. 2014) 41 F.Supp.3d 927.) The Ninth Circuit reversed, keeping the waiting period in place. (Silvester v. Harris (9th Cir. 2016) 843 F.3d 816.) The Supreme Court denied certiorari. As the dissent from that denial lamented, "the Court of Appeals [which] upheld California’s 10-day waiting period for firearms based solely on its own ‘common sense’ … is symptomatic of the [nation’s] lower courts’ general failure to afford the Second Amendment the respect due an enumerated constitutional right." (Silvester v. Becerra, supra, 138 S.Ct. at p. 945 (dis. opn. of Thomas, J., italics added.)