Litigation
Cal. Litig. 2021, Volume 34, Number 2
Content
- EDITOR'S FOREWORD PPP = POST-Pandemic Planning
- FROM THE SECTION CHAIR The Best Is Yet to Come
- How to Strike the Answer of a Non-Participating Defendant
- Jury Trials in the COVID-19 Era: The Importance of a Predetermined Trial Plan
- Masthead
- Navigating the Adversary Proceeding in Bankruptcy for General Litigators
- Remedies for the Courthouse Flu: How to Get Your Civil Case Tried During the COVID-19 Crisis
- Revisiting California's No-Citation Rule
- Sheppard Mullin and Beyond: Advance Waivers, Disclosures, and Arbitration Agreements
- Table of Contents
- The CAA v. The FAA: The Dangerous Differences
- The Future of the Virtual Courthouse
- The Once and Future Office Market: A Tale of Complexity and Change for Lawyers
- Two #MeToos — A Pair of Book Reviews: "She Said" & "Catch and Kill"
- Recovering Attorney Fees in Arbitration
Recovering Attorney Fees in Arbitration
By Charles H. Dick, Jr.
Charles H. Dick, Jr. is a neutral with JAMS, and he serves as a mediator and an individual arbitrator or member of multi-arbitrator panels in complex commercial matters, securities and investment disputes, professional liability cases, products liability issues, and other business-related controversies.
An accurate assessment of damages is critical for case evaluation, and the cost of dispute resolution plays an important role in deciding to pursue claims. Even strong liability cases can fail to make economic sense. That is why a thorough case appraisal should thoughtfully consider the attorney fees to be incurred. And equally important, an objective case valuation should assess the likelihood of recovering attorney fees.
The "American Rule," which specifies that each party must bear its own attorney fees, is a lesson for law school’s first year, and though the rule has been slightly modified to encourage certain litigation in the public interest, fee-shifting remains the exception rather than the rule. Against this background, professional responsibility obliges counsel to keep clients informed about litigation economics (Cal. Rules Prof. Conduct, rule 1.4)âsomething critically important as a case approaches the inevitable mediation. Unfortunately, experience teaches that an exacting analysis of litigation cost and exposure to fee-shifting often is an afterthought, and that the development of case strategies, discovery plans, and tactical maneuvers occurs without thoughtfully weighing the implications of the American Rule and its exceptions. This is a recurring issue in arbitration.