Intellectual Property Law
New Matter WINTER 2017, Volume 42, Number 4
Content
- 2018 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- Case Comments
- Contents
- Federal Circuit Report
- Intellectual Property Section Executive Committee 2017-2018
- Intellectual Property Section Interest Group Representatives 2017-2018
- Letter from the Chair
- Letter from the Editor-in-Chief
- MCLE Self-Study Article
- Ninth Circuit Report
- Online Cle For Participatory Credit
- Quarterly International Ip Law Update
- The Federal Circuit Revisits Inequitable Conduct: How the Best-Laid Schemes of Mice and Men Go Often Awry
- The Licensing Corner
- The State Bar of California Intellectual Property Alumni
- Ttab Decisions and Developments
- Ip and Art: An International Perspective
IP and Art: An International Perspective
Cristina Manasse
Manasse Studio Legale, Milan
THE PARODY DEFENSE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
In Belgium, a painting by a well-known artist painted a sort of "portrait" that looked substantially like a photograph and the photographer sued. The painter claimed a defense of "parody," permissible under Belgian and EU law. He lost.1