Criminal Law
Crim. Law Journal Spring 2019, Vol. 19, Issue 2
Content
- Hidden Costs of Bail Reform: How Bail In California Could Go From Hurting Poor Defendants To Hurting Poor Counties
- Incarcerated Veterans In Need of Representation When Filing Petitions For Resentencing
- Juanita Spinelli: the First Woman Executed At San Quentin State Prison
- Masthead
- Message From the Chair
- Thank You For Your Service: Acknowledging Our Inadequate Treatment of Jurors In California's Death Penalty Debate
- Enriching Our Nation's History: Establishing a Historical Exception To Grand Jury Secrecy
ENRICHING OUR NATION’S HISTORY: ESTABLISHING A HISTORICAL EXCEPTION TO GRAND JURY SECRECY
By Daniel Aronsohn*
Introduction
The grand jury is indispensable in its role as the guardian against unwarranted prosecutions. But it is much more than that. The grand jury is a historical archive. As the mechanism for criminal indictment, the institution of the grand jury has confronted exceptional events of vast historical import. What occurs before a grand jury, however, is generally protected by a longstanding tradition of secrecy.1 Under the general rule of secrecy, the public is unable to access grand jury materials regardless of the proffered reason.2
The inability to access grand jury information can be a considerable loss to society. With their expansive power to investigate and accuse, grand juries provide a wealth of information. It is essential that the public gain access to that information for two principal reasons. First, enhancing the historical record is paramount.3 Second, improving public access to grand jury information ensures transparency of the federal government, a valuable notion in democratic government. History can provide real-life insight into the successes of American government in addition to its missteps.