Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law
Competition: Fall 2015, Vol 24, No. 2
Content
- A Tale of Two Statutes: Cipro, Edwards, and the Rule of Reason
- Antitrust Treatment of State Licensing Boards In the Wake of North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners V.F.T.C.
- Breaking a Monopoly: Vigilante Justice or the Sort of Innovative Approach We Celebrate?
- Capitalizing On Judicial Antitrust Experience
- Chair's Column
- Editor's Note
- Health Care Merger Analysis In the Era of Payment Reform
- Masthead
- Mobile Apps: Redefining the Virtual California Economy and the Laws That Govern It
- Off-label Use of the Cartwright Act: Will Cipro Require State Courts To Assess Federal Patent Validity In Pay-for-delay Cases?
- Pleading An Antitrust Conspiracy In a Post-twombly World
- Promoting Antitrust Compliance the Antitrust Division's Subtle Shift Regarding Corporate Compliance: a Step Toward Incentivizing More Robust Antitrust Compliance Efforts
- Putting Cipro Meat On Actavis Bones: a Case Study In Filling In the Legal Gaps
- The Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section
- The Magna Carta and the Sherman Act
- The Northern District of California Opens Its Doors To the World's Civil Antitrust Disputes
- What You See Isn't What You Get: How the Colgate Doctrine May Apply To the Disposable Contact Lens Antitrust Litigation
- Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PUTTING CIPRO MEAT ON ACTAVIS BONES: A CASE STUDY IN FILLING IN THE LEGAL GAPS
By Jordan Elias ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1
OFF-LABEL USE OF THE CARTWRIGHT ACT: WILL CIPRO REQUIRE STATE COURTS TO ASSESS FEDERAL PATENT VALIDITY IN PAY-FOR-DELAY CASES?
By Dylan M. Carson and Avril G. Love………………………………………………………………7
A TALE OF TWO STATUTES: CIPRO, EDWARDS, AND THE RULE OF REASON
By Steven M. Perry and Sean F. Howell ……………………………………………………………..21
HEALTH CARE MERGER ANALYSIS IN THE ERA OF PAYMENT REFORM
By Kenneth W. Field and Douglas E. Litvack ………………………………………………………42
ANTITRUST TREATMENT OF STATE LICENSING BOARDS IN THE WAKE OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF DENTAL EXAMINERS V. F.T.C.
By David Gringer…………………………………………………………………………………………..50
WHAT YOU SEE ISN’T WHAT YOU GET: HOW THE COLGATE DOCTRINE MAY APPLY TO THE DISPOSABLE CONTACT LENS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
By James M. Mulcahy and Filemon Carrillo……………………………………………………….60
BREAKING A MONOPOLY—VIGILANTE JUSTICE OR THE SORT OF INNOVATIVE APPROACH WE CELEBRATE
By Ryan McCauley ………………………………………………………………………………………..76
MOBILE APPS: REDEFINING THE VIRTUAL CALIFORNIA ECONOMY AND THE LAWS THAT GOVERN IT
By Alexandra McDonald, Jason McDonell, and Caroline Mitchell…………………………..86
THE MAGNA CARTA AND THE SHERMAN ACT
By David G. Meyer……………………………………………………………………………………….106
CAPITALIZING ON JUDICIAL ANTITRUST EXPERIENCE
By Peter K. Huston………………………………………………………………………………………113
PLEADING AN ANTITRUST CONSPIRACY IN A POST-TWOMBLY WORLD
By Joshua Stokes and Jordan Ludwig ……………………………………………………………….121
THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OPENS ITS DOORS TO THE WORLD’S CIVIL ANTITRUST DISPUTES
By Lee F. Berger and Sophie J. Sung………………………………………………………………..145
THE ANTITRUST DIVISION’S POSITION REGARDING CORPORATE COMPLIANCE: A STEP TOWARD INCENTIVIZING MORE ROBUST ANTITRUST COMPLIANCE EFFORTS
By Heather S. Tewksbury, Ryan D. Tansey and Alicia Berenyi……………………………….157