Business Law Opinions Resources

State of California Department of Corporations Willie R. Barnes, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This letter is not an Interpretive Opinion for the reasons stated below. Mr. Vernon W. HaasAttorney at Law21 Arcade DriveVentura, CA 93003 Dear Mr. Haas: The request for an interpretive opinion, contained in your letter dated April 28, 1975, as supplemented by your letters dated May 1, 1975 and May 12, 1975, has been considered by the Commissioner. Your letters raise the question whether… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Willie R. Barnes, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This letter is not an Interpretive Opinion for the reasons stated below. Mr. William D. MahoneyAttorney at Law111 West La Habra BoulevardPost Office Box 584La Habra, CA 90631 Dear Mr. Mahoney: The request for an interpretive opinion, contained in your letter dated March 13, 1975, has been considered by the Commissioner. Your letter raises the question whether the so-called “Training and Licensing Agreements” {“Agreements”)… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Willie R. Barnes, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This letter is not an Interpretive Opinion for the reasons stated below. Mr. Robert J. EadingtonAttorney at LawEadington, Queen, Brewer & O’HarraFirst Western Bank Building1666 North Main Street, Suite 336Santa Ana, CA 92701 Dear Mr. Eadington: The request for an interpretive opinion, contained in your letter dated September 20, 1974, has been considered by the Commissioner. Your letter: raises the question whether the arrangements… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Willie R. Barnes, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This letter is not an Interpretive Opinion for the reasons stated below. Mr. Bryant M. SmithAttorney at Law845 Oak Grove, Suite 105Menlo Park, CA 94025 Dear Mr. Smith: The request for an interpretive opinion, contained in your letter dated October 29, 1974, has been considered by the Commissioner. Your letter raises the question whether the so-called “IDent-A-Pet Agency and Commission Agreements” (“Agreements”) between IDent-A-Pet,… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Robert L. Toms, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This letter is not an Interpretive Opinion for the reasons stated below. Mr. C. Brian O’GormanAttorney at LawEckert, O’Gorman & McFarland160 North Fairview Avenue, Suite 4Goleta, CA 93017 Dear Mr. O’Gorman: The request for an interpretive opinion, contained in your letter dated September 6, 1974, has been considered by the Commissioner. Your letter raises the question whether the agreement between Lodestar Productions, Inc., an… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Robert L. Toms, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This letter is not an Interpretive Opinion for the reasons stated below. Mr. Phillip A. PutnamAttorney at LawAndress, Block, Putnam& Ronayne 8409 Westminister AvenueWestminister, CA 92683 Dear Mr. Putnam: The request for an interpretive Opinion, contained in your letter dated June 27, 1974, has been considered by the Commissioner. Your letter raises the question whether the “Supplier Agreements”(“Agreements”). between Maxi Lift International, Inc., a Nevada… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Robert L. Toms, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This letter is not an Interpretive Opinion for the reasons stated below. Mr. Williams W. Stark, Jr.Attorney at Law2000 San Hill Road, Building 2Menlo Park, CA 94025 Dear Mr. Stark: The request for an interpretive opinion, contained in your letter dated March 25, 1974, has been considered by the Commissioner. Your letter raises the question whether the so-called “TennisAmerica Affiliation Agreement” between TennisAmerica, Inc.,… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Robert L. Toms, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This letter is not an Interpretive Opinion for the reasons stated below. Mr. Jerome M. BameAttorney at LawCoen and BameTown & Country Center18582 Beach Boulevard, Suite 213Washington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Bame: The request for an interpretive opinion, contained in your letter dated March 8, 1974, has been considered by the Commissioner. Your letter raises the question whether the arrangements between Jay-Rock Sales,… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Robert L. Toms, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This letter is not an Interpretive Opinion for the reasons stated below. Mr. Martin N. DanielAttorney at Law315 South Beverly DriveSuite 515Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Dear Mr. Daniel: The request for an interpretive opinion, contained in your letter dated November 16, 1973, has been considered by the Commissioner. Your letter raises the question whether the arrangements between Rat-A-Way Western, Incorporated, a California corporation (… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Robert L. Toms, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This letter is not an Interpretive Opinion for the reasons stated below. Mr. Donald M. LevitzVice President, NorthernCalifornia Region4155 E. Jewell Avenue, Suite 616Denver, CO 80222 Dear Mr. Levitz: The request for an interpretive opinion, contained in your letter dated November 29, 1973, as supplemented by your letter dated March 1, 1974, has been considered by the Commissioner. Your letters raise the question whether… Read more