Intellectual Property Law
New Matter SPRING 2019, Volume 44, Number 1
Content
- 2019 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- Contents
- Copyright News
- Federal Circuit Report
- Intellectual Property Section Executive Committee 2018-2019
- Intellectual Property Section Interest Group Representatives 2018-2019
- Ip and Art: An International Perspective
- Letter from the Chair
- Letter from the Editor-in-Chief
- MCLE Self-Study Article
- Ninth Circuit Report
- Online Cle For Participatory Credit
- Quarterly International Ip Law Update
- The California Lawyers Association Intellectual Property Alumni
- The Licensing Corner
- Ttab Decisions and Developments
- Case Comments
Case Comments
Lowell Anderson
Stetina Brunda Garred & Brucker
ARBITRATION
"[P]arties may agree to have an arbitrator decide not only the merits of a particular dispute but also ”gateway” question of arbitrability,’ such as whether the parties have agreed to arbitrate or whether their agreement covers a particular controversy.’" But if the demand for arbitration is "wholly groundless" some courts have taken it upon themselves to decide the gateway question of arbitrability to enable courts to block frivolous attempts to transfer disputes from the court system to arbitration." Interpreting the Federal Arbitration Act as written, "[w]hen the parties’ contract delegates the arbitrability question to an arbitrator, a court may not override the contract." The court may decide whether the agreement delegates the arbitrability question to an arbitrator. A decision denying arbitration was vacated and remanded. Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc., 139 S.Ct. 524, 202 L.Ed.2d 480 (2019).