According to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals (the Circuit Court) there is a distinction between whether ERISA applies to and governs a retirement plan and whether the plan complied with ERISA’s requirements to receive tax benefits. Therefore, even if the debtors’ defined benefit retirement plans were not “qualified” under ERISA because of violations in their use, they still were excluded from his bankruptcy estate by 11 U.S.C. § 541(c)(2). McDonnell v. Gilbert (In re Gilbert), ___ F4th ___, 2024 WL 4645582 (3rd Cir. November 1, 2024). To view the opinion, click here: Read more
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals (the Circuit Court) recently affirmed the district court in concluding that denying chapter 7 debtors a discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2)(B) when they elected to apply tax year 2019 tax refunds to potential tax year 2020 taxes was improper because the bankruptcy court’s factual finding that they did so with actual intent to hinder creditors was clearly erroneous. Read more
The following is a case summary written by Gary B. Rudolph, a director at Fennemore LLP’s San Diego office, analyzing In re Village Oaks Senior Care LLC, 664 B.R. 170 (Bankr. ED CA 2024) a recent decision of interest. Read more
The following is a case summary written by Robert Harris and Kathleen A. Cashman-Kramer regarding the recent California Court of Appeal decision in Bijan Boutiques, LLC v. Isong, 104 Cal.App.5th 132 (Court of Appeal, Fourth District, August 13, 2024), holding that while a property division by a marital settlement agreement between divorcing spouses may be challenged as a fraudulent or voidable transfer, a property division entered by contested court order in a marital dissolution may not be. Read more
The following is a case summary written by Chase A. Stone regarding the recent California Supreme Court’s recent decision in JJD-HOV Elk Grove, LLC v. Jo-Ann Stores, LLC, 17 Cal.5th 256, 560 P.3d 297 (2024). Read more
The following is a profile of the Honorable Theodor Albert – the latest in a series of profiles of Ninth Circuit bankruptcy judges. Judge Albert and members of the Insolvency Law Committee and Business Law Section Executive Committee met in Judge Albert’s chambers and discussed his personal and professional background, observations from the bench, and other issues of interest. Read more
The following is a case update written by Hale Andrew Antico, Chief Counsel of Antico Law Firm, analyzing In re Wike, 660 B.R. 683 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2024) (“Wike”). Read more
It is a pleasure to invite you to join the Business Law Section (BLS) of the California Lawyers Association – and to share with you of some of the benefits of membership, and if you are a member, to thank you for your continuing support. Read more
The following is a case summary written by Gary M. Kaplan, a partner at Farella Braun + Martel LLP in San Francisco, analyzing Saldana v. Bronitsky (In re Saldana), 122 F.4th 333 (9th Cir. Nov. 22, 2024), a recent decision of interest. Read more