Business Law

State of California Department of Corporations Robert L. Toms, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This letter is not an Interpretive Opinion for the reasons stated below. Mr. Williams W. Stark, Jr.Attorney at Law2000 San Hill Road, Building 2Menlo Park, CA 94025 Dear Mr. Stark: The request for an interpretive opinion, contained in your letter dated March 25, 1974, has been considered by the Commissioner. Your letter raises the question whether the so-called “TennisAmerica Affiliation Agreement” between TennisAmerica, Inc.,… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Robert L. Toms, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This letter is not an Interpretive Opinion for the reasons stated below. Mr. Jerome M. BameAttorney at LawCoen and BameTown & Country Center18582 Beach Boulevard, Suite 213Washington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Bame: The request for an interpretive opinion, contained in your letter dated March 8, 1974, has been considered by the Commissioner. Your letter raises the question whether the arrangements between Jay-Rock Sales,… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Robert L. Toms, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This letter is not an Interpretive Opinion for the reasons stated below. Mr. Martin N. DanielAttorney at Law315 South Beverly DriveSuite 515Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Dear Mr. Daniel: The request for an interpretive opinion, contained in your letter dated November 16, 1973, has been considered by the Commissioner. Your letter raises the question whether the arrangements between Rat-A-Way Western, Incorporated, a California corporation (… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Robert L. Toms, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This letter is not an Interpretive Opinion for the reasons stated below. Mr. Donald M. LevitzVice President, NorthernCalifornia Region4155 E. Jewell Avenue, Suite 616Denver, CO 80222 Dear Mr. Levitz: The request for an interpretive opinion, contained in your letter dated November 29, 1973, as supplemented by your letter dated March 1, 1974, has been considered by the Commissioner. Your letters raise the question whether… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Robert L. Toms, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This letter is not an Interpretive Opinion for the reasons stated below. Mr. Thomas H. ColemanAttorney at LawGrossman, Smaltz, Graven & PerryOne Wilshire Building – Suite 2420Los Angeles, CA 90017 Dear Mr. Coleman: The request for .an interpretive opinion, contained in. your letter dated-April 18, 1974, has been considered by the Commissioner. Your letter raises the question whether the arrangements between U-Fix, Inc. dba… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Brian R. Van Camp, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This letter is not an Interpretive Opinion for the reasons stated below. Mr. Marsh V. Racine, PresidentDimensional Housing Division3270 Cherry AvenueLong Beach, CA 90807 Dear Mr. Racine: The request for an interpretive opinion, contained in your letter dated September 27, 1973, has been considered by the Commissioner. Your letter raises questions regarding the so-called “Associate Distributorship Agreement” (“agreement”) between Racine Homes, Inc., a… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Brian R. Van Camp, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This letter is not an Interpretive Opinion for the reasons stated below. Mr. Joseph L. StrabalaAttorney at LawFryer, Tjensvold, Phillips &Lempio250 Sansome StreetSuite 1310San Francisco, CA 94111 Dear Mr. Strabala: The request for an interpretive opinion, contained in your letter dated October 9, 1973, as supplemented by the material received in this office on December 20, 1973, has been considered by the Commissioner.… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Brian R. Van Camp, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This letter is not an Interpretive Opinion for the reasons stated below. Mr. James F. McGrillPresidentNational Glass Service Inc.385 Arnold StreetWoonsocket, RI 02895 Dear Mr. McGill: The request for an interpretive opinion contained in your letter dated September 20, 1973, has been considered by the Commissioner. Your letter raises the question whether the agreements between national glass Services, Inc. (“National”) and persons referred… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Brian R. Van Camp, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This letter is not an Interpretive Opinion for the reasons stated below. Mr. J. R. RuckerNewFangled Piping HotSandwich Machine Co.3030 – 20th StreetSan Francisco, CA Dear Mr. Rucker: The request for an interpretive opinion, contained in your letter received by us on August 20, 1973, has, been considered by the Commissioner. Your letter raises the question whether the Independent Wholesale Distributor of Agreements… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Brian R. Van Camp, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This letter is not an Interpretive Opinion for the reasons stated below. Mr. Colin C. KelleyAttorney at Law66 Jackson London SquareOakland, CA 94607 Dear Mr. Kelley: The request for an interpretive opinion, contained in your letter dated October 19, 1973, has been considered by the Commissioner. Your letter raises the question whether the agreement entered into on May 9, 1973, between Stork Bonds… Read more