Business Law Opinions Resources

State of California Department of Corporations Brian R. Van Camp, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This interpretive opinion is issued by the Commissioner of Corporations pursuant to section 31510 of the franchise investment law. It is applicable only to the transaction identified in the request therefor, and may not be relied upon in connection with any other transaction. Mr. James G. Engler3903 W. Legion LaneLos Angeles, CA 90039 Dear Mr. Engler: The request for an expression of our… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Brian R. Van Camp, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This interpretive opinion is issued by the Commissioner of Corporations pursuant to section 31510 of the franchise investment law. It is applicable only to the transaction identified in the request therefor, and may not be relied upon in connection with any other transaction. Mr. Jeffrey A. NortonAttorney at LawNorton & Norton341 North Maple DriveBeverly Hills, CA 90210 Dear Mr. Norton: The request for… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Brian R. Van Camp, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ Mr. W. Harrison LysterInternational Tape Distributing CorporationEncino, CA 91316 Dear Mr. Kassoy: On the basis of the representations contained in your letter dated August 24, 1971, Interpretive Opinion No. 71/45F is amended and supplemented in the following respects: 1. The 3rd and with sentences of the 3rd paragraph of said opinion are amended. to read as follows: “This agreement provides for the securing… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Brian R. Van Camp, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This interpretive opinion is issued by the Commissioner of Corporations pursuant to section 31510 of the franchise investment law. It is applicable only to the transaction identified in the request therefor, and may not be relied upon in connection with any other transaction. Mr. B. Thomas BanardAttorney at LawRhodes, Banard & Maloney1244 Sixth StreetSanta Monica, CA 90406 Dear Mr. Banard: The request for… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Brian R. Van Camp, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This interpretive opinion is issued by the Commissioner of Corporations pursuant to section 31510 of the franchise investment law. It is applicable only to the transaction identified in the request therefor, and may not be relied upon in connection with any other transaction. Mr. Joseph E. NidaAttorney at LawSchramm, Raddue & SeedPost Office Box 1260Santa Barbara, CA 93102 Dear Mr. Nida: The request… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations James L. Kelly, Acting Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This interpretive opinion is issued by the Commissioner of Corporations pursuant to section 31510 of the franchise investment law. It is applicable only to the transaction identified in the request therefor, and may not be relied upon in connection with any other transaction. Mrs. Dorothy A. SchmidtReal Estate BrokerP.O. Box 255June Lake, CA 93529 Dear Mrs Schmidt: The request for an expression of… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Anthony R. Pierno, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This interpretive opinion is issued by the Commissioner of Corporations pursuant to section 31510 of the franchise investment law. It is applicable only to the transaction identified in the request therefor, and may not be relied upon in connection with any other transaction. Mr. Llewellyn JohnsAttorney at LawGunheim, Yturbide, Rose,Johns and Winther 1231 Market Street-PenthouseSan Francisco, CA 94103 Dear Mr. Johns: The request for an… Read more

State of California Department of Corporations Brian R. Van Camp, Commissioner In reply refer to: File No. _____ This interpretive opinion is issued by the Commissioner of Corporations pursuant to section 31510 of the franchise investment law. It is applicable only to the transaction identified in the request therefor, and may not be relied upon in connection with any other transaction. The request for an interpretive opinion contained in your letter dated July 7, 1971, has been considered by the Cornmissioner.… Read more