Dear constituency list members of the Insolvency Law Committee, the following is a case update analyzing a recent case of interest: SUMMARY On June 11, 2014, in Heller Ehrman LLP v. Davis, Wright, Tremaine, LLP, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruled that the trustee of the bankruptcy estate of the defunct law firm Heller Ehrman LLP (“Heller”) could not recover fees earned by other law firms on Heller matters that former Heller shareholders took with… Read more
Dear constituency list members of the Insolvency Law Committee, the following is a case update analyzing a recent case of interest: SUMMARY On June 9, 2014, in Executive Benefits Ins. Agency v. Arkison, the United States Supreme Court ruled that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(c)(1), a bankruptcy court may make proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in a Stern “core” proceeding subject to de novo review by an Article III court. To read the full decision, click here: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/13-339_886a.pdf. FACTS The Palavedas owned two companies… Read more
Dear constituency list members of the Insolvency Law Committee, the following is a case update on a recent decision of interest: SUMMARY The Supreme Court of the United States held that a bankruptcy court exceeded the limits of its authority by imposing a surcharge on a debtor’s homestead exemption to pay for a chapter 7 trustee’s litigation fees and costs incurred in avoiding a fraudulent lien against estate property created by the debtor. In a unanimous opinion written by Justice… Read more
Dear constituency list members of the Insolvency Law Committee, the following is a case update analyzing a recent case of interest: SUMMARY In connection with the proposed sale of substantially all of the debtors’ assets free and clear of liens under Bankruptcy Code Section 363(k), the bankruptcy court for the District of Delaware found “cause” within the meaning of Section 363(k) to limit the senior secured creditor’s right to credit bid its secured claim to the discounted amount the secured… Read more
Dear constituency list members of the Insolvency Law Committee, the following is a recent case update: SUMMARY The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit affirmed the bankruptcy court’s dismissal, with prejudice, of a debtor’s fraudulent transfer action seeking to avoid the sale of tax-defaulted real property because: (i) the complaint failed to allege sufficient facts, (ii) the debtor unduly delayed in seeking to amend the complaint, and (iii) amendment of the complaint was futile, since a properly conducted sale… Read more
Dear constituency list members of the Insolvency Law Committee, the following is a case update on a recent decision of interest: SUMMARY The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that fraud which would have justified the bankruptcy court denying a discharge under 11 U.S.C. §727(a)(4)(A) will support an action to revoke a discharge under 11 U.S.C. §727(d)(1). Jones v. U.S. Trustee, Eugene, ___ F.3d ___, 2013 WL 6224330 (9th Cir. 2013 Dec. 2, 2013 Dkt. no. 12-35665) (“Jones”). … Read more
Dear constituency list members of the Insolvency Law Committee, the following is a case update on two cases of interest that will be heard by the United States Supreme Court: SUMMARY This January, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on two bankruptcy cases originating out of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals: Law v. Siegel, No. 12-5196 and Executive Benefits Ins. Agency v. Arkison, No. 12-1200. The cases present distinct questions. In Law, the question is whether—pursuant either to its… Read more