Litigation
Cal. Litig. VOLUME 38, ISSUE 2, SEPTEMBER 2025
Content
- A CASE FOR RETIRING THE "CALLS FOR SPECULATION" OBJECTION
- Ai In Criminal Cases In 2025: Use of Ai-generated Evidence In Investigations and Trial
- Chair's Column
- Cla Statement On the Rule of Law
- Editor's Foreword: Rapid Change Alongside Perennial Things
- Fearless Speech: Breaking Free From the First Amendment
- Innovation Meets Tradition At the Ninth Circuit Library
- Interview With Chief United States Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney
- Paintings, Pipes and Paga
- PAST SECTION CHAIRS & EDITORS-IN-CHIEF
- SECTION OFFICERS & EDITORIAL BOARD
- State-federal Court Reporter Comparison
- Table of Contents
- The American Inns of Court
- The Daedalus Doctrine: Flying the Middle Path of Ai In Legal Practice
- The Impact of Emotions On Judging
- Working: Conversations With Essential Workers Behind the Scenes In the Court System
- How Does Civility In the Appellate Courts Differ From Civility In the Trial Courts?
HOW DOES CIVILITY IN THE APPELLATE COURTS DIFFER FROM CIVILITY IN THE TRIAL COURTS?
Written by Hon. J. Clifford Wallace
Recently, California Litigation asked Judge Wallace to answer the question posed in the title above with reference to the immediately preceding essay, which he wrote many years earlier. He replied with the lines below.
It is true that the larger focus has been upon providing help to would-be trial lawyers, but the principles used can be easily accommodated at the appellate level. Indeed, I was not in favor of specialized appellate lawyering at the first level of appeal as a lawyer at the appellate level is much more effective if he/she has training for both levels.
"The Inns of Court" is the original beginning document of the effort. The rules dealing with how a lawyer should function, collegiality, etc., are strikingly similar at the two levels, so the "The Inns of Court" can be applied at both levels.