Antitrust and Consumer Protection
Competition: Spring 2016, Vol 25, No. 1
Content
- 2015: a Year of Big Plaintiff Wins In Antitrust and Privacy Cases
- Big Stakes Antitrust Trials: O'Bannonvnational Collegiate Athletic Association
- California Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Update: Procedural Law
- California Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Update: Substantive Law
- Chair's Column
- Considerations, Not Limitations: An Argument Against Defining the Anticompetitive Harm Under F. T.C. Vactavis As the "Elimination of the Risk of Potential Competition"
- Editor's Note
- Ftc Data Security Enforcement: Analyzing the Past, Present, and Future
- Golden State Institute 25Th Anniversary Retrospective and Prospective Views On California Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law
- Keynote Address: a Conversation With the Honorable Tani Cantil-sakauye, Chief Justice of California
- Managing Antitrust and Complex Business Trials-a View From the Bench
- Masthead
- Royal Printing and the Ftaia
- The Decision of the Supreme People's Court In Qihoo Vtencent and the Rule of Law In China: Seeking Truth From Facts
- The Nexium Trial Pioneers Actavis' Activation: a Roundtable of Nexiums Counsel Reflect On Their Six-week Trial
- The Ucl-now a Money Back Guarantee?
- Settlement Negotiation Tactics, Considerations and Settlement Agreement Provisions In Antitrust and Ucl Cases: a Roundtable
SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATION TACTICS, CONSIDERATIONS AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PROVISIONS IN ANTITRUST AND UCL CASES: A ROUNDTABLE
Moderated by Paul Riehle1
INTRODUCTION
While trial lawyers love to talk about trying cases—hence the Golden State Institute’s successful long-running panels on Big States Antitrust Trials,—the reality is that many cases settle. Why antitrust cases and Unfair Competition Law ("UCL") class actions settle, how they settle, when they settle, what they settle for, settlement agreement provisions and other settlement considerations are rarely the subject of frank public discussion involving leading lawyers with plaintiff, defense and government. We are fortunate to have such an accomplished panel of counsel discuss those topics and other intractable issues in settling antitrust cases and UCL class actions.
Our illustrious panel consists of: