Antitrust and Consumer Protection
Competition: Spring 2014, Vol. 23, No. 1
Content
- Chair's Column
- Do First Amendment Principles Limit the Antitrust Agencies' Ability To Prohibit Enforcement of Standards-essential Patents?
- Does the First Amendment Immunize Google's Search Engine Search Results From Government Antitrust Scrutiny?
- Editor's Note
- First Amendment Protection For Search Engine Search Results
- Judges Speak Out: the Make-or-break Moment of Certifying a Class With Judges Marsha Berzon, Virginia Phillips, John Wiley, and Curtis Karnow
- Landmark Civil Price-fixing Verdicts of 2013: Lessons From the Vitamin C and Urethanes Trials With Trial Counsel and Observers William a. Isaacson, Daniel S. Mason, Joseph Goldberg, and Michael Tubach
- Lcd Redux: Follow-on Class Action and Direct Purchaser Litigation From 2012'S Doj Criminal Prosecutions Views from Trial Experts Bruce Simon, Howard Varinsky, and Robert Freitas
- Masthead
- Noerr-pennington: Safeguarding the First Amendment Right To Petition the Government
- Regulation of Companies' Data Security Practices Under the Ftc Act and California Unfair Competition Law
- The Irrelevance of the First Amendment To the Modern Regulation of the Internet
- The Market-participant Exception To State-action Immunity From Antitrust Liability
- The Misapplication of Matsushita's Heightened Summary Judgment Standard
- The Supreme Court In Borough of Duryea V. Guarnieri Signals a Retreat From Pre's Broad Deference To the Right To Petition
- Trial By Sample: a Post-game, Locker Room Chat Exploring the McAdams V. Monier Trial: a Roundtable With Trial Counsel Jeffrey Cereghino and William Stern
- Update On California State Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law and Federal and State Procedural Law
UPDATE ON CALIFORNIA STATE ANTITRUST AND UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW AND FEDERAL AND STATE PROCEDURAL LAW
By Thomas A. Papageorge and Thomas Greene*
Editor’s Note: Every year, at the October Golden State Institute, Tom Papageorge and Tom Greene provide an extensive overview of recent developments in, respectively, state antitrust substantive law and relevant federal procedural law. Their outlines are thorough and well-done. The Committee receives numerous requests for copies of their fine work. In order to provide their outlines to as many of our members are possible, The Editors of Competition have decided to publish their work herein. Please note that, while the authors have done their best to annotate this outline, this Update reflects new cases and developments as of October 2013. Furthermore, these are a selection of developments that may be particular important to members of the Section. Please consult other references for all of the developments that may be important to your practice.