Antitrust and Consumer Protection
Competition: Fall 2018, Vol 28, No. 1
Content
- Above Frand Licensing Offers Do Not Support a California Ucl Action In Tcl V Ericsson
- Antitrust Is Already Equipped To Handle "Big Data" Issues
- Antitrust, Privacy, and Digital Platforms' Use of Big Data: a Brief Overview
- Antitrust Treatment of the Introduction of New Drug Products: the Tension Between Hatch-waxman's Dual Goals of Cheaper Drugs and Better Drugs
- Applying Illinois Brick To E-Commerce: Who Is the Direct Purchaser From An App Store?
- D-Link Systems: Possible Signs For the Future of Ftc Data Security Enforcement
- Editor's Note
- Masthead
- "No-poach" Agreements As Sherman Act § 1 Violations: How We Got Here and Where We're Going
- Smart Contracts and Blockchains: Steroid For Collusion?
- The Difficulties of Showing Pass Through In Indirect Purchaser Component Cases
- The Hold-up Tug-of-war—Paradigm Shifts In the Application of Antitrust To Industry Standards
- Chair's Column
CHAIR’S COLUMN
Jill M. Manning
Steyer Lowenthal Boodrookas Alvarez & Smith LLP
San Francisco, CA
The Antitrust, Unfair Competition & Privacy Law Section of the California Lawyers Association is pleased to provide you with the 28th edition of Competition Journal. This edition is particularly intriguing, with articles focusing on cutting-edge antitrust issues, including the application of antitrust law to blockchains, algorithmic price-fixing, the intersection between antitrust law and new drug products, the challenges of demonstrating pass-through in IPP cases, and whether Apple’s app store might constitute a monopoly. Special thanks to Editor-in-Chief, Anna Fabish, and her team of terrific authors and editors for their hard work in putting this compelling issue together.