Taxation
Ca. Tax Lawyer VOLUME 33, ISSUE 1, DECEMBER 2024
Content
- 2023-2024 Executive and Standing Committee Leaders
- A Critique of the Cryptic Rules For Taxing Crypto
- An Overview of the History of California Residency
- ARE 1031 DROP & SWAP REAL ESTATE EXCHANGES IN JEOPARDY IN CALIFORNIA?
- Committee Quick Points
- Message From the Chair
- Perfecting the Informal Refund Claim (No Malpractice, Please)
- Table of Contents
- Three Taxation Section Awards Presented At the Annual Tax Conference In Palm Springs In November 2023
- The Office of Tax Appeals Sources An Individual Partner's Distributive Share of Partnership Gain Using Corporate Apportionment and Allocation Rules In the Appeal of Smith
THE OFFICE OF TAX APPEALS SOURCES AN INDIVIDUAL PARTNER’S DISTRIBUTIVE SHARE OF PARTNERSHIP GAIN USING CORPORATE APPORTIONMENT AND ALLOCATION RULES IN THE APPEAL OF SMITH
By Annie Rothschild1
BACKGROUND
In recent years, the Office of Tax Appeals (OTA) and California courts have considered multiple cases addressing how owners of a pass-through entity source income from the pass-through. Each case considered whether the nonresident owners should use individual sourcing rules for sales of intangibles under California Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC) section 17952 or corporate apportionment rules for nonresident income from a business, trade, or profession under California Code of Regulations ("CCR") section 17951-4.
First, in The 2009 Metropoulos Family Trust, et al. v. Franchise Tax Bd. (2022) 79 Cal.App.5th 245, the California Court of Appeal applied CCR section 17951-4(d) to source nonresident trust shareholders’ distributive shares of a unitary multistate S corporation’s gain on the sale of goodwill. The gain was business income and was apportioned, partially to California, using the S corporation’s apportionment factors. More recently, in Appeal of Buehler, 2023-OTA-215P, the OTA found that R&TC section 17952 applied to appellants’ receipt of gain for sale of their shares in a limited liability company ("LLC"). R&TC section 17952 applied because the appellants derived the income themselves through their direct ownership interest in the LLC-it was not income earned by the LLC and passed through to appellants as their distributive share.