Taxation
Ca. Tax Lawyer 2016, VOLUME 25, NUMBER 4
Content
- A Proposal to Address the Improper and Unreasonable Fees Imposed by California Counties on Taxpayers When Exercising Their Rights to Appeal Assessed Property Taxes
- Bad Moon Rising? Proposed Section 2704 Regulations
- Bar Business
- Contents
- Editor's Note
- In Defense of Regulations: California, Market-Based Sourcing, and the Defense Industry
- Masthead
- Minutes from the 2016 Meeting of Eagle Lodge West
- Taxation Section 2015-2016 Leadership Directory
- The United States Income Tax Treatment of Australian Superannuation Funds Owned by U.S. Persons (Part 2 of 2)
- Visiting the Committees
- Message from the Chair
Message from the Chair
By Robert S. Horwitz
This will be my final Message from the Chair, since Betty Williams became the Chair of the Taxation Section in October. The Taxation Section is much changed since I became Chair in October 2015. First, based on the success of the Women in Tax Law session at last year’s Annual Meeting of the California Tax Bar, the Section recently formed a new standing committee named "Women in Tax Law Committee." The first co-chairs are Renae Welder and Annette Nellen. I thank Adria Price, the able editor of the California Tax Lawyer, for her role in helping form the Committee, and for the superb job she has done as editor of the California Tax Lawyer.
As mentioned in my most recent Message from the Chair, a change that affects the entire State Bar is that the Legislature made the Bagley-Keene open meetings act applicable to the State Bar, including the sections. This caused the Taxation Section, and the other Sections, to alter the way in which they operate.
The battle over deunification of the State Bar goes on. In June, the Assembly passed a state bar bill that would reduce the number of members of the Board of Trustees from 19 to 13, the majority of whom will be not be attorneys, create a state bar enforcement program monitor to monitor and evaluate the State Bar disciplinary systems and procedure and create a commission to recommend whether the State Bar should remain a unified bar or be de-unified. This bill has not been enacted and as of this date, the Legislature has yet to enact a state bar bill for 2017. Whether one will be enacted by the August 31 deadline is unknown.