Real Property Law

Cal. Real. Prop. Journal 2020, VOL. 38, NO. 2

Stay, Not Pay? The Goudelock Decision’s Impact on Owners, HOAs, and Foreclosing Lenders

Katrina E. Solomatina

Katrina E. Solomatina is a real estate attorney with Hopkins & Carley, a premier Silicon Valley law firm. Katrina advises on various aspects of real estate, including: purchase and sale agreements, commercial leases, compliance with Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, construction agreements, licenses, easements, title issues, project financing and title insurance, due diligence, and land use and permitting. Katrina is a frequent speaker and writer on real estate topics.*

I. INTRODUCTION

Bankrupt property owners may benefit from the recent Ninth Circuit ruling in Goudelock v. Sixty-01 Ass’n of Apartment Owners ("Goudelock"),1 which shifts post-petition burdens of homeownership to creditors and lienholders in Chapter 13 filings as to post-petition homeowner association ("HOA") assessments. In 1994, Congress reformed the bankruptcy code to make it clear that owners who filed Chapter 7 bankruptcy petitions must pay HOA assessments that come due after the filing of the petition in bankruptcy. This was often referred to as "you stay, you pay." Congress failed, however, to clarify if that obligation extended to owners who file for Chapter 13 bankruptcy protection.

Join CLA to access this page

Join

Log in

Forgot Password

Enter the email associated with you account. You will then receive a link in your inbox to reset your password.

Personal Information

Select Section(s)

CLA Membership is $95 and includes one section. Additional sections are $95 each.

Payment