Litigation
Cal. Litig. 2020, Volume 33, Number 2
Content
- A Long and Winding Road to Undo Bad Supreme Court Law
- Stringfellow Acid Pits: the Toxic and Legal Legacy By Brian Craig
- That Family Is Wrong for You: Religious Objections Before the Supreme Court
- Intellectual Property Litigation and Other Updates in the Video Game Industry as of April 2020
- Navigating the New Settled Statement Procedures
- Recent Legislative Changes Affect Long-Standing Pre-Trial Discovery Practice
- Nuts and Bolts of Videoconference Dispute Resolution in the Time of Covid-19
- Showing Lack of Probable Cause: Plaintiff's Burden of Proof in Opposing an Anti-Slapp Motion Attacking a Malicious Prosecution Claim
- Table of Contents
- McLe Article Threats, Extortion and Legitimate Advocacy
- Navigating the New Settled Statement Procedures
- Insurance Coverage Analysis Avoids Malpractice Landmines
- Nuts and Bolts of Videoconference Dispute Resolution in the Time of Covid-19
- Masthead
- Intellectual Property Litigation and Other Updates in the Video Game Industry as of April 2020
- That Family Is Wrong for You: Religious Objections Before the Supreme Court
- Affirmative Action Quandaries the Affirmative Action Puzzle: a Living History from Reconstruction to Today (Pantheon:322 Pages) By Melvin I. Urofsky
- Stringfellow Acid Pits: the Toxic and Legal Legacy By Brian Craig
- Insurance Coverage Analysis Avoids Malpractice Landmines
- Recent Legislative Changes Affect Long-Standing Pre-Trial Discovery Practice
- A Long and Winding Road to Undo Bad Supreme Court Law
- From the Section Chair News for a New World
- Editor's Foreword Sweet Successes — On or About 31 Flavors
- Showing Lack of Probable Cause: Plaintiff's Burden of Proof in Opposing an Anti-Slapp Motion Attacking a Malicious Prosecution Claim
- McLe Article Threats, Extortion and Legitimate Advocacy
- Masthead
- Affirmative Action Quandaries the Affirmative Action Puzzle: a Living History from Reconstruction to Today (Pantheon:322 Pages) By Melvin I. Urofsky
- Table of Contents
- From Cla's Ceo a Personal Plea for Addressing the Root Causes of Racism
- From the Section Chair News for a New World
- The Puzzle of Precedent in the California Court of Appeal
- Editor's Foreword Sweet Successes — On or About 31 Flavors
- The Puzzle of Precedent in the California Court of Appeal
- From Cla's Ceo a Personal Plea for Addressing the Root Causes of Racism
The Puzzle of Precedent in the California Court of Appeal
By Justice Michael J. Raphael
The Honorable Michael J. Raphael is a Justice on the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two.
The California Court of Appeal may be unique as an appellate court that is formally a single court establishing binding statewide precedent, but which nevertheless sits in regional divisions. That situation presents two puzzles that do not exist elsewhere in the same way.