Litigation
Cal. Litig. 2014, Volume 27 Number 1
Content
- Masthead
- Table of Contents
- From the Section Chair
- Hypotheticals on Litigational Plagiarism:
- Editor's Foreword Signing On: Big Shoes to Fill
- Another Amazing Year in the Supreme Court
- Officers of a Court Do Not Plagiarize
- Plagiarism: Naughty, Knotty
- Can Use of Administrative Procedures Expedite Complex State Court Civil Litigation?
- Can We Shorten This Trial?
- Statements of Decision: Errors, Omissions, and Solutions
- The Perils of Punishing Public Employees for Protected Speech: Applying Pickering v. Board of Education to Posts and Pins
- Adr Update: Can Post-Award Searches Vacate Arbitration Awards?
- Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame (2004): 62 Years in the Practice of Law
- "I Learned About Litigating from That" In Memory of Joel a. Cohen
- McDermott On Demand: Ozymandias?
- Litigation Section Executive Committee Past Chairs
- Past Editors-in-Chief
Can Use of Administrative Procedures Expedite Complex State Court Civil Litigation?
By David L. Huard and Lenard G. Weiss
David L. Huard
Lenard G. Weiss
Apartner of ours is fond of saying, "Litigation is the blood sport of the wealthy." As California state trial courts are increasingly absorbed with criminal matters, complex civil litigation is increasingly delayed, due, in part, to the length of time complex trials consume as well as the lack of ever-decreasing court resources.