Litigation
Cal. Litig. 2015, Volume 28, Number 3
Content
- Amicus Briefs in the California Supreme Court: Indicia of their Importance and Impact
- An Injunction by any Other Name: Mandatory and Prohibitory Preliminary Injunctions
- Book Review
- California Courts on Active Duty
- Follow-Up to Concepcion
- From the Section Chair Your Litigation Section has been busy!
- Language Access for All
- Litigation Section Executive Committee Past Chairs
- Masthead
- McDermott On Demand: and In This Corner...
- My First Jury Trial
- Past Editors-in-Chief
- Table of Contents
- The Demurrer a Play in Two Acts
- Working From Home: Appellate Collaboration in the Digital Age
- Editor's Foreword Help for litigants, help for the courts
Editor’s Foreword Help for litigants, help for the courts
By Benjamin G. Shatz
The initial checklist that runs through your mind at the start of litigation undoubtedly covers items like subject matter jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, venue, statutes of limitations, and the like. And you probably also take stock of whether there’s anything special about any of the parties (disabilities? juvenile? elderly?) that could trigger preferences or other unusual treatment. (See, e.g., Code Civ. Proc. § 36.) This issue’s lead article should prompt you to add another checkbox to your list: Is any party in the military or a veteran? In California Courts on Active Duty, Justice Eileen Moore, a veteran herself, takes on the herculean task of compiling the various state and federal laws that distinguish ordinary civilian litigation from matters involving service personnel and veterans. These differences span the legal gamut from civil, criminal, family, probate, juvenile and other matters. Litigators who fail to discover the possible military histories of their own clients and other parties in a case are headed into a minefield.
On the general topic of checklists, be sure to check out a book published back in 2009, The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right, by Atul Gawande, which Malcolm Gladwell called "powerful and thought-provoking" in addressing "how professionals deal with the increasing complexity of their responsibilities." To lighten the complications of finding the article in this issue that’s right for you, what follows is a quick checklist of our exciting content. But really, you’ll want to read them all.
Litigation is complicated and confusing enough as it is in "plain English," but how much more frustrating can it be for millions of Californians with limited proficiency in English? Read Language Access for All, by Judges Steve Austin and Manual Covarrubias to learn how our courts are meeting the challenges of our polyglot populace.